<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colorado subsidized apartments 6.7% vacant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/12/colorado-subsidized-apartments-6-7-vacant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/12/colorado-subsidized-apartments-6-7-vacant/</link>
	<description>Colorado&#039;s Real Estate News Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnRebchook</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/12/colorado-subsidized-apartments-6-7-vacant/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnRebchook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=3007#comment-385</guid>
		<description>How about 17.5%?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about 17.5%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/12/colorado-subsidized-apartments-6-7-vacant/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=3007#comment-384</guid>
		<description>&quot;it is a 17.544% percentage change.&quot;
So, if your calculator went out to 16 places, it would be a bigger (in digits) number?!
How about &quot;17%&quot;, which is &quot;close enough for government work&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;it is a 17.544% percentage change.&quot;<br />
So, if your calculator went out to 16 places, it would be a bigger (in digits) number?!<br />
How about &quot;17%&quot;, which is &quot;close enough for government work&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

