About John Rebchook

john_smallJohn Rebchook is a former Rocky Mountain News reporter with more than 30 years of experience in writing and communications... (Read More)

Sign up for our Newsletter!

First Name:
Last Name:
Email:

Categories

Refinancing could save Denver-area homeowners $600 million annually

Are you thinking of refinancing? Take a poll at the end of this blog.

Denver-area homeowners could potentially save almost $600 million a year by refinancing their mortgages into the record-low rates available, according to an analysis by InsideRealEstateNews.com.

While there does appear to be an uptick in refinancing, phones are not ringing off the hook in lender offices. Meanwhile, even the trifecta of good news for home buyers – super-low rates, housing prices well off their peaks, and an increased of supply of unsold homes on the market to choose from – have not been driving people to buy homes. In June, the number of homes placed under contract plunged by 31 percent from June 2009.

InsideRealEstateNews used Census Bureau data and national reports to estimate the number of homeowners who could shave 2 percentage points or more off their mortgages. If they all did, it would save them an estimated $597.3 million annually, excluding the costs of refinancing. And the estimate is likely conservative, as some lenders say it makes sense for some homeowners to refinance, even if they could cut their mortgage rate by a half of a percent or less.

Crazy low rates

Zillow.com reported today that the average 30-year, fixed-rate at 4.49 percent, a 15-year, fixed-rate at 3.98 percent and a 5-year ARM at 3.98 percent. “It is absolutely crazy,” said Kay Cleland, president of the Colorado Association of Mortgage Brokers. “Everybody should be taking advantage of these unbelievably low mortgage interest rates.”

One way to look at it, is that refinancing would be the equivalent of the metro area homeowners getting a $600 million, tax-free raise.

“That would have a huge impact on the economy,” said independent real estate broker and consultant Gary Bauer. “And those savings would have a three or four times trickle rate, so if you take that $600 million, it could have a $2.4 billion impact on the economy. To put that into perspective, in the first six months of this year we sold $5.3 billion in homes, so the savings would be the equivalent of about 45 percent of the homes sold.”

He said he has one client who refinanced his mortgage and is now saving about $600 per month.

Fixed rates and ARMs attractive

Pete McGlynn recently refinanced his mortgage, cutting about two points from his mortgage.

Although he didn’t want to discuss exact numbers, he said he is saving so much he will recoup his closing costs in only two months, and the rest of the savings will be gravy.

“When you can save a third, it’s not really a tough one to think about,” McGlynn said.

Unlike many people he went from a 30-year-fixed-rate loan, which had about 27 years remaining on it, to a 7-year, adjustable rate mortgage.

“I had enough equity in my home to qualify for an interest-only ARM,” McGlynn said. McGlynn, a sophisticated purchaser who works in the financial arena, thought it was unlikely that he would spend 30 years in his 3,175-square-foot house, so he didn’t want to pay for 30-year money.

“I probably will be in my house for just about the length of my mortgage, and probably no more than 10 years,” he said.

Another person, so prominent that he has a spokesman, recently traded his $1.1 million, 5-year, interest-only loan with a 6-percent interest rate, for a $1.057 million, 30-year fixed-rate loan with a 5 percent interest rate, according to documents obtained by InsideRealEstateNews. That would save him about $920 a month in principal and interest payments.

The spokesman, who talked about the refinance on the condition that his employer’s name not be used, said that his boss is like thousands of other homeowners who wanted to save money. He also wanted the security of fixed-rate loan, he said. He didn’t take any money out of the home with the refinancing, even though the home is worth $1.508 million, according to public records. “He’s like thousands of other homeowners who wants to take advantage of the low rates,” the spokesman said.

Tough economy hurts refinancing

Yet, a surprisingly small number of homeowners are taking advantage of the lowest rates in their lifetime. During past periods of falling rates, consumers typically were beating down the doors of lenders. Many of them had to hire additional staff to meet the demand.

A big part of it could be the economy, said Mike Rinner, of the Genesis Group, which tracks housing along the Front Range.

“If you had a 50 percent drop in your income, no matter how low interest rates go, it might not help you,” Rinner said. “I don’t think people are dumb. They know interest rates are down. But I think the key is you also have to have jobs. Even though we might be slightly better in the Denver area and in Colorado than in the nation as a whole, there are fewer people working today than a year ago, and that is not encouraging. If people had jobs and were confident they would keep them, everything else would fall into place.”

Still, Rinner said if you can qualify for a lower rate and increase your cash flow, it is easy enough to estimate how long it will take to pay back the cost of refinancing, he said.

And increasingly homeowners are taking a advantage of the low rates, although not as many as many experts would expect.

Refinance surge is tame

“I think everyone’s business is up,” said Peter Lansing, president of Universal Lending, a sponsor of InsideRealEstateNews and one of the largest locally owned mortgage banking companies in the Denver area. “But I wouldn’t call it off the hook. I’d say we’re up 10 to 15 percent. In the past, when we saw big drops, we were up 40 percent or 50 percent.”

There are likely several reasons why more consumers aren’t cashing in on refinancing, Lansing said.

“No. 1, many people may have already financed to a level not as low as today’s rates, but still one they are happy with,” Lansing said. “No. 2, people are concerned about the appraised value of their homes. In some cases, they might have to bring cash to the closing to get the full value of the lower rates. And others might have job issues that are keeping them from refinancing.”

Part of it might be psychological, he said. Even if the numbers pencil out, some people may simply be numb to the super-low rates.

“I suspect for some people going from a 8 percent to a 6 percent loan may seem like a bigger deal than going from a 6 percent to a 4 percent loan,” Lansing said. “I don’t know why that is, but I suspect that could be part of it.”

Tom Clark, Executive Vice President of the Metro Denver Economic Development Corp., agreed that more people should be taking advantage of the low rates.

“I cannot tell you how many people I have been talking with who have $200,000, $300,000 mortgages, and they know they should be refinancing, but just aren’t,” Clark said. “I think the reason people are hesitating, when it it is in their best interests, is all relative to how freaked out they are by the economy. With everything going on, it just leads to this kind of paralysis. It’s amazing what inertia can do. It really is giving yourself a pay raise without having to argue with your boss. It’s free money.”

Lansing said that rates this low are astounding.

“We put my sister into a 6.125 percent loan last year, and I thought we were giving her the lowest rate she would ever have,” Lansing said. “I thought that was going to be her last mortgage. And we just did a refinance for her for a 20-year loan. It has a rate of 4.125 percent, I think.”

Underwater homes don’t sink refinancing

Anita Padilla-Fitzgerald, president and CEO of MegaStar Financial, said she thinks media reports of falling home values may have convinced consumers that their homes won’t appraise at high enough values to refinance. However, she noted that the Federal Housing Administration, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac all have programs that allow refinances without appraisals.

Still, reports that homeowners can’t take advantage of the low rates might be one reason that MegaStar’s business is currently 70 percent for purchases and 30 percent for refinances. Often, when rates were falling, many lenders experienced the opposite – 70 percent refinances and 30 percent purchases.

Depending on the situation, it could make sense for some people to refinance for a half-percent or less, Padilla-Fitzgerald said.

“It might make some sense for some people to go from a 5 percent to a 4.5 percent loan,” she said.

One road-block for some people refinancing is that they can’t roll their closing costs into the new loan, because their homes are so deeply under water – that is, their mortgages are worth far more than their homes, even when using various programs that don’t require appraisals, said Tom Gross, a mortgage broker with Crestline Mortgage, which is part of Universal Lending. Those programs include Freddie Mac Streamline and Fannie Mae RefiPlus and DU RefiPlus, as well as some FHA and VA programs.

“I just haven’t had any clients who want to do that,” Gross said.

But Dan Brown, principal of Spire Financial, said that is not a huge problem. If a homeowner has no equity in their home, he said a lender can often structure a loan that is higher than the rates available to the most qualified borrowers with great credit scores and lots of equity, but still lower than the existing.

Few loans for self-employed

A bigger problem is that while loans are relatively easy to get for people with standard paychecks and W-2 income, there are few options available for the self-employed. For example, a business owner might take a lot of write-offs, which under-estimates how much the owner actually earns.

Brown has one client who makes $80,000 a month, has an 800-credit score, and a a great deal of equity in his home, but it still took four months to find a lender willing to refinance his loan.

“I know a lady who wanted to buy a home in Boulder for $400,000,” Brown said.”She does not currently have a job, but she is receiving a settlement from her brother’s death, which will mean $1.6 million in her bank over the next two years and nine month. He said she was planning to make a large down payment, but didn’t want to pay cash and use up a quarter of her assets. But when she couldn’t get a loan, she walked away.

“Think of that poor home seller,” Brown said. “He thought he had a buyer of his home at a reasonable price. Now, he has to put it back on the market.”

Get help help from a pro

Brown said because every case is different,  the old rule of thumb that you need to lower your rate by a full percentage point, is not true for everyone.

“If you have a $417,000 mortgage, it might make sense to refinance if you can drop your rate by a half percent, because the savings are so great,” Brown said. “But if you have a $100,000 loan, it might only make sense if you can lower it by a full percentage point or a point and a half. Anyone who tells you there are rules of thumb is just full of it. This is not a business where one size fits all.”

And for some people, it doesn’t make sense to refinance, no matter how low rates fall.

One homeowner in Evergreen, for example, has only 6.5 years left before his loan is paid off, and so has been ignoring the siren call of low rates.

“He is absolutely right,” Brown said. “When you’re that close to paying it off, you are paying mostly principal, anyway. There is no point of amortizing a loan over 15 or 30 years, when you can see the light at the end of the tunnel.”

The only exception might be if a sophisticated borrower was looking at the home as just  another asset that could generate cheap money, which could be used to invest that could provide a much greater return than the negligible after-tax cost of the mortgage.

But if Brown could leave consumers with only one piece of advice, it would be to encourage them not to do it alone. He suggests that they use a trusted mortgage broker or mortgage banker that they have used in the past, or has been referred to them by someone they trust.

“I tell people I don’t care if it is me; I honestly don’t,” Brown said. “I don’t think it is a good idea to get a loan through the Internet or by calling a 800 number. If you try to navigate this process yourself, you are taking a big risk. Discuss your particular situation with someone who you trust. Tell them exactly what your goal and he can help you achieve those goals.”

Do you plan to refinance or have you recently refinanced your mortgage?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Related Posts:

9 comments to Refinancing could save Denver-area homeowners $600 million annually

  • Chris

    I would love to refi into the lower rates from my current 6.59%, but I have a HELOC with Compass Bank and they have told me that they will not re-subordinate their loan. So, I am basically stuck.

  • Michele

    If banks would consider refinancing homes that are underwater to qualified borrowers for the current loan balance they would be inudated with applications! That is the least banks and the “powers that were” should do for causing such a financial disaster in the first place!!! It would keep people from doing short sales and would benefit both parties. I guess it makes too much sense for that to happen.

    Signed, a very angry homeowner in CA

  • Mark

    The other side of the story . . . This article would have you believe that it is the homeowners’ option to refinance. The truth is the very mortgage brokers and banks who are responsible for the nation’s subprime mortgage crisis have cornered homeowners into a loosing scenario. They will not refinance or make the loans to help out those whos taxes bailed them out last year. Why would they cut mortgage interest rates for those upside down and hooked into the higher rate? It is profitable for them to draw the higher interest rate. This leaves the homeowner two options – suck it up and pay the higher rate or walk away.

  • Yeah, and the lenders make a fortune refinancing all the suckers. We are just slaves to 30 years mortgages. It is time to rethink the entire process. Think about it. You refi. after 6 years of payments, and you start the 30 year term all over again.
    You have just walked away from 6 years of payments. A really bad idea. A really bad idea.

    Turn that 30 year loan into a 36 year loan to save 1.5% on your rate. Start that amortization over to save $200 a month. Save $200 a month, and have it cost you $70,000 in mortgage payments from the last 6 years. Anyone who does that has never been instructed on the way amortizations really work. Call a broker who is smart, and get the true story. Or just do some research. Learn and stop making the same mistakes over and over again.
    randy

    • Arch

      Randy! Get hold of yourself! The past mortgage payments haven’t done anything but pay interest on the debt and a modest reduction of the principal owed on that debt. If you refinance the debt for the balance due; at a lower rate and, apply the difference between what you have been paying and the new lower payment, as a further reduction of the principal amount owed, you will save substantially by reducing the term over which the loan will be repaid. A shorter term for repayment will result in a reduction of the amount of interest paid. Walla! – A savings of interest and a reduction in the term of the loan. Ahem, I’m sure that is what you meant to say. Or, was it? Do you have handy the number of a really smart broker?

  • Guest

    I would love to refinance. Unfortunately, refinancing a non owner occupied home with two self employed individuals is IMPOSSIBLE!

  • Arch,
    Not at all. Do the math.
    The way amortizations are set up is almost criminal.
    If you refi a loan after 6 years you walk away from 6 years of payments and start the amortization process over. The only one who wins is the bank.
    It is not a level playing field. Seriously, calculate the cost and the savings, but this time ad in the 6 years of payments that you have thrown out the window. Thirty years of payments is always going to be better than 36 years of payments, especially considering the process involved in the amortization, and the simple fact that most loans are only kept for approx. 11 years. (Estimated from ancient data)
    You have missed the entire point.
    An amortized loan pays predominantly interest for about 10 years. If you refi, you just start that predominantly interest payment all over again. And, you walk away from 6 years of payments. That is bad business, and we have been brainwashed into accepting it for the $200 payment reduction. It is the way to permanent debt.
    Pay off your loan, don’t refi it to lower your payment by $200.
    That should be the new paradigm for the next generation, given the current financial mess this generation is in.
    How many foreclosures are enough?
    How many foreclosures does it take for us to realize that the current system is flawed from the beginning?
    320,000 foreclosures a month shows two things:1) a bad economy 2) A flawed and unfair method of financing.
    And yes, the world is round. It is that obvious.
    Randy

    • Arch

      Sorry I’m so late in getting back; been out playing on the water.
      Your response to my comments demands a reply. You are right about the state of the economy; it is a mess. But using faulty thinking in financial transactions doesn’t solve the problem. My suggestion Randy, now that you have discovered that the world is round, is that you take a remedial course in financial math; buy one of those new fangled financial calculators or, better, a computer with an Excel spreadsheet, and do the math correctly. It isn’t enough to know how to add, you have to know which numbers to use. The real estate market would be in even worse condition if the so called “unfair method of financing”, i.e. “amortization”, wasn’t available to the majority of the people who want to buy homes. In your world, I guess, people just pay cash for the house and enjoy. Ta Ta.
      Randy, put your shoes back on; throw away the pencil, Pink Pearl eraser, and the Big Chief tablet. Have that smart broker help you with the math. Simply amazing!

  • Mike

    Lenders getting mort. holders to refinance over & over & over just for slightly lower interest rate each time was a game that added immensely to foreclosure problem—let’s do it again or some more!!