The state could lose more than 17,000 jobs if Congress goes forward with massive cuts to the military and space budgets, the Colorado Space Coalition is warning.The CSC – a group of industry stakeholders including space companies, military leaders, academic organizations, research centers and economic development groups – is urging Colorado’s Congressional delegation to help stave off the cuts.
In a letter sent on Friday, the CSC warns that these “sequestration” cuts could devastate space technologies such as secure global communications and satellites for precision navigation, surveillance, and reconnaissance–”areas in which Colorado’s aerospace industry excels.”
The sequestration cuts would cut $1.2 trillion from the budget – half from the military – over a 10-year period. It was the deal mandated by Congress last year to deal with the budget-ceiling crisis, if a compromise spending plan cannot be reached.
“Colorado lies at ground zero for these cuts,” with programs such as the deep space Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, NASA’s Commercial Crew Development program, and multiple satellite design and construction programs as critical drivers of the local economy, warns the CSC.
Frank Slazer, vice president of Space Systems for the Aerospace Industries Association, came to Denver on Friday to address these issues at a CSC meeting.
“The last thing America can afford is yet more cuts to our leadership in space,” Slazer said. “From tracking wildfires to finding al Qaeda terrorists, space power becomes more central to American life every day. But these budget cuts would put these capabilities and more at risk. That means less warning for weather disasters and more years paying the Russians $60 billion a pop for our astronauts to reach the space station that we largely funded and built.”
Major General John “Andy” Love, co-chair of the CSC, warns that the impact on Colorado would be especially severe: “We’ve spent years building up one of the strongest space economies in the nation here in Colorado, and sequestration puts it all at risk,” Love said.
“Arbitrary, across-the-board spending cuts are no way to tackle our budget problems,” Love continued. “And waiting for the final outcome is causing crippling uncertainty within the industry. We need long-term thinking that prioritizes the most important investments and focuses cuts on luxuries and waste. One-size-fits-all sequestration would be a grave mistake.”
On Tuesday, the AIA and economist Stephen Fuller of George Mason University will unveil a report detailing job loss figures resulting from the Budget Control Act of 2011.
The report, commissioned by the AIA, will update previous projections of defense-dependent job losses and provide the what it is calling the first comprehensive analysis of anticipated job losses in other sectors of the economy.
Have a story idea or real estate tip? Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com. InsideRealEstateNews.com is sponsored by Universal Lending, Land Title Guarantee and 8z Real Estate.com
















Unfortunately, if we want to cut government spending back to 18% of GDP, you will see job losses in every state. In Colorado, Democrats will argue to extend the wind tax credit to save 1600 jobs at Vestas and the Republicans will argue against the military cuts to save jobs in Colorado Springs. In reality, we need to make across the board cuts if we want to solve our fiscal crisis. If every member of Congress keeps fighting for every pet project in their district, we will go broke. Eventually, we will need to adopt some form of Simpson-Bowles As Winston Churchill once said, “The Americans will always do the right thing… after they’ve exhausted all the alternatives.”
I found this very interesting. It’s a CNBC interview with Warren Buffet, Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/48166800
Duh.
Pork is pork.
“Arbitrary, across-the-board spending cuts are no way to tackle our budget problems,” Love continued. “And waiting for the final outcome is causing crippling uncertainty within the industry. We need long-term thinking that prioritizes the most important investments and focuses cuts on luxuries and waste. One-size-fits-all sequestration would be a grave mistake.”
General Love-
“Arbitrary, across-the-board spending cuts” might be the only way to solve our budget problems. If we let politicians decide what pet projects get cut, none will. I mean look at these tough choices politicians face. How can we live without the deep space Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle? Or for that matter, how can people over the age of 68 that have millions of dollars in the bank live day to day without their Medicare and Social Security? What will Warren Buffet do every month if his Social Security fails to show up in the mail?