
This 1,760-square-foot home sold last month for $334,000, close to the average price of $324,497 for a home closing in June.
The temperature of the Denver-area housing market in June was like the weather – in a word, hot.
“It was a dynamite month,” said independent Realtor Gary Bauer. “The market is hot – dynamite hot.”
A report released today by Metrolist, the largest Multiple Listing Service in Colorado, showed that by almost every metric the market improving at a blistering pace in June from June 2011.
It’s a trend that is expected to continue.
Sizzling summer
“We expect the Denver market to really sizzle this summer,” said Kirby Slunaker, CEO and president of Metrolist, Slunaker, President and CEO of Metrolist,
There were 5,363 homes placed under contract in the Denver area last month, a 12.6 percent increase from the 4,761 in June 2011.
The 4,904 closings last month were up 20.2 percent from the 4,080 in June 2011.
The average price of a single-family home hit $324,497 – the highest level in almost two years – and 11 percent higher than the $292,230 average price in June 2011. Prices are up primarily because of the mix of homes being sold, Bauer said.
The median price of a single-family home was $269,500, up 12.3 percent from $240,000 a year earlier.
“I don’t like to focus on the days on market, but they have gone down dramatically,” Bauer said.
The average days on the market for all homes fell 30.8 percent to 72 days in June from 104 days a year earlier.
“There is now about a 2 1/2 month supply of unsold homes in the market,” Bauer said.
“I won’t say that it has turned into a seller’s market from a buyer’s market until we are well past that point, but clearly in many neighborhoods it is a seller’s market,” Bauer said. “And the number of areas where that is happening is growing every day.”
Inventory remains low
The number of unsold homes on the market fell 39.4 percent in the 12 months ending in June. There are only 10,925 unsold homes on the market, compared with 18,026 in June 2011. The number of unsold homes rose only 3 percent from May, when the inventory stood at 10,591.
“In other words, product that’s priced right and ready to sell is moving quickly,” Slunaker said.“The bottom line is we need more available inventory for homebuyers to choose from.”
Dan Polimino, of Keller Williams-DTC, said he expected far more homes to have been placed on the market from the start of the seasonal strong selling season.
“I really thought that we would see an influx of maybe 3,000 or 4,000 single-family homes added to the market from April 1 to July 31,” Polimino said.
“It didn’t happen and it isn’t going to happen.”
He noted that the supply is low, while demand is rising.
Bucking the trend
“Denver is an anomaly compared to a lot of other parts of the country,” Polimino said. “A lot of it is just supply and demand. We need to explain that to a lot of people who are relocating from other markets,” where the buyers can still take their time before signing on the dotted line.
That is a sentiment shared by Slunaker.
“With double-digit increases in prices and sales volume from last year, I have to think Denver is among the better performing markets in the U.S. today,” Slunaker said.
Denver’s housing market never had the highs and never had the lows of many other markets, Polimino said.
And to borrow an accounting term – FIFO, Denver was first in, first out.
“Our market peaked in 2006, while a lot of other markets didn’t peak until 2008,” he said. “In 2006 and 2007, we were still leading the nation in foreclosures, while other markets didn’t start experiencing that it in a big way until 2008 and 2009.”
Scott Webber, president of Fuller Sotheby’s International Realty, said there are not many foreclosures, or REOs (Real Estate Owned homes) on the market now.
“Six months from now, I think prices will be higher,” Webber said. “I don’t know if today’s market conditions are sustainable. A year from now, there may be more REOs on the market and there will definitely be more competition from new homes,” which eventually will be part of the resale market, he said.
“Clearly, we are well past the bottom and are starting to come up again,” Webber said.
One reason that the inventory is so low, “is because a lot of homeowners are still under water,” Webber said. That is, their mortgage is still worth less than the sales price.
“With values rising, more people will be able to sell their homes in the future,” Webber said. “There is quite a bit of pent-up demand out there. People want to take advantage of these historically low interest rates while they are still around. And after November, people will know who has won the Presidential election, which will bring some certainty to the market.”
He said some well-heeled buyers are starting to snap up luxury homes in markets where there had been no activity for three or four years.
“And we are starting to see people buy vacant lots to build custom homes,” Webber said. “We haven’t seen that for three or four years. We also continue to see multiple offers on a lot of homes.”
Polimino said that the blistering heat may be keeping some prospective buyers from looking at homes.
“Honestly, I’ve tried to get a handle on the weather to determine to what degree it impacts buying, without much success,” he said. “I think when it is really nice out, Coloradans like to be outside. When it is really crappy out, they like to stay indoors. So I think the best weather is when it is kind of in-between.”
But are buyers turned off by a home when a home doesn’t have air conditioning or a swamp cooler?
“When it is 100 degrees outside, I’m sure people think about air conditioning, and I’m sure it turns some people off,” Polimino said. “It shouldn’t. Air conditioning can always be a negotiating point. You can write in the contract they either give you a credit for a.c. or install it for you. This is something most people won’t give a thought to in October, but it is high on everyone’s list when it is this hot out.”
Have a story idea or real estate tip? Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com. InsideRealEstateNews.com is sponsored by Universal Lending, Land Title Guarantee Co. and 8z Real Estate.















“There is now about a 2 1/2 month supply of unsold homes in the market,” which is the same a zero.
Wow!
“Our market peaked in 2006, while a lot of other markets didn’t peak until 2008,” he said. “In 2006 and 2007, we were still leading the nation in foreclosures, while other markets didn’t start experiencing that it in a big way until 2008 and 2009.
Not true according to Case Shiller almost every MSA peaked the same time as Denver in 2006.
You are correct, all but a couple of markets peaked at the same time. But, I have made the same mistake as the person that said that. i believe the mistake derives from the fact that Denver did not really have a bubble in the three years leading up the peak, and that the Denver market bottomed before the other markets. From the perspective of the Denver Real Estate person Denver’s relatively flat market from 2003-2006 seemed like it was going backwards compared to the hyper bubble markets of SoCal, Fl, AZ and NV.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/rent-increases-outpace-modest-home-price-rises-reports-trulia-2012-07-03
i thought this trulia data was interesting. I think this is higher that actual, but it shows denver rents +10.9% Y/Y for June. third highest increase of the 25 metro areas they follow. up dramatically from the +9.4% Y/Y for May.
Where is the shadow inventory? Where is the shadow inventory?
Prices will at least double throughout this cycle. Enjoy the ride.
Well Dan- here we go again with the 500% gain in 7 year nonsense. You better hope unemployment starts to fall and wages also double in this cycle. I don’t see how you can have one without the other.
You will also need help from the GSEs and HUD via FHA to enable your prediction. The FHA and fannie/freedie loan limit will need to be raised by congress. I don’t see the private label securitization market coming back any time soon. 1st time home buyers will need to be able to save quite a bit of money for the FHA required $25,000 down payment for their $560,000 median priced home(3.5% plus closing costs). I’m sure all their student loan debt won’t be an issue.
One more thing. Assuming you are correct Dan, inflation will be running around 12%. This will force the FED to raise FED funds rate to around 14%, in turn mortgages rates back to 16%. Assuming prices double, the average priced home in Denver will be just under $700,000. This will make a 80% LTV loan $560,000. The monthly payment will be around $8,000 per month. The issue I see is demand for housing under these conditions. Most move up buyer will have current loans with rates between 3.5-5.5%. My question to you is, on the margin, will they want to give up these low rates/payments to move?
Hey Dan- you will need better employment numbers than today’s BLS monthly report for home to double. In June, we added 80k jobs, unemployment rate 8.2%, U-6 14.9%. Without full employment you will not get wage inflation, without wage inflation, you will not get home prices to double.
Dan-the 10 year treasury today at 1.54% is pricing in disinflation or at best 1-2% inflation.
Gold is down 25% form it’s 2011 high. Not signaling inflation.
You will be interested in this
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2012/06/08/1030801/the-end-of-artificial-scarcity/
US Dollar index is at a 1 year high. You will need the dollar to weaken relative to other currencies in order to ignite the kind of inflation you are predicting. Home prices won’t have a parabolic rise in a vacuum. .
One last thing Dan, you tell us to, “enjoy the ride”. FYI-there is nothing enjoyable about 10+% inflation. Just ask the Grermans, Hungarians, and Argentinians.
Let me clarify once again. Prices will approx double do to supply/demand. Prices will increase a lot more if there is inflation. It is quite possible for prices to quadruple or more during this cycle. I don’t invest in gold and I don’t think there will be hyperinflation, so why do you keep bringing that up?
Levered real estate investors will be the greatest winners in the investment world over the next 7 years. It’s so predictable. It would be highly unlikely for me to be wrong on this. Look at the 1970′s and explain to me what happened to real estate prices while interest rates increased dramatically. It’s a complete farce that prices will fall when interest rates rise. It’s amazing so many people believe this. Maybe in your simplistic view they would, but there are many factors at work that will prove you wrong.
Dan, the reason home prices increased during the 70′s was because we had high inflation and everything went up. When Paul Volcker raised rates making the prime 20%(in 1981) home prices in the 80′s had the slowest growth rate of any decade. As you can see from the chart below, the 1980′s was a terrible decade for real estate. My guess is 20% rates had something to do with it. Why don’t you ask some of the agents selling in the 80′s during how great the market was. High rates will cause homes to decline.
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/values.html
1980 marked the end of the inflationary period and massive asset bubble. A similar asset bubble will form. Even after a 7 fold price gain during the 70s all non-oil states still saw large continued price gains during the 80s. Why do I care if it is difficult for someone to get an 11% mortgage since they will have to rent my property with 10% annual rent increases. You would be wise to be on the right side of this equation since it is inevitable.
Since 46M American receive food stamps(1 in 7), I don’t see how they are going to afford your 10% yearly rent increases. But, I’m sure you have an answer for that as well. Perhaps something that happened 40 years ago in the 1970′s?
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57467305/house-bill-would-cut-food-stamps-farm-subsidies/
The vast majority of the 45M Americans on food stamps are renters, not homeowners. Just a guess, but I would assume, 1 out of 4 renters are on food stamps. Good luck raising the rent too much.
Just because you love the 1970′s so much, in 1970 1 out of every 50 Americans were on food assistance. Now it’s 1 in 7.
If the government wants to assist me in my investments, I am not opposed. More gov assistance means more cash available for rent.
@Look at the 1970′s and explain to me what happened to real estate prices while interest rates increased dramatically. It’s a complete farce that prices will fall when interest rates rise. It’s amazing so many people believe this. Maybe in your simplistic view they would, but there are many factors at work that will prove you wrong.
Let me give you some more simplistic reasons you are foolish. In 1970 the median home in Colorado cost $17,300 and the median wage was $6,186(home cost was 2.7x the median wage) in 2010 today the median priced home is $265,000 and the median wage is $41,600(home cost was 6.3x the median wage). Does it make more sense now why homes we able to increase more in the 70′s than today? I know my reasoning is simplistic compared to your extensive research with data theory, “because it happened in the 70′s it will happen again.
http://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/AWI.html
There is supposed to be no apostrophe in 1970s.
Dan, take a step back and think about what you are saying. Yes, prices rise/fall based off of supply and demand. But, in order to double or quadruple you will need massive wage inflation or 100% LTV stated non recourse loans again. Period.
Any one else see any other way home prices double in the next 5 years? Dave? JohnD? You both are rational. Please comment.
Dan, you need to stop watching late night infomercials on buying 100′s of homes with no money down.
I don’t need to watch the infomercials, I’ve already done it. Maybe you should start working your ass off buying, fixing, and renting property like I do rather than denying the obvious market forces.
Dan, when prices start to rise, builders build homes again. Supply will increase. Did you forget about the guys/girls with the hammers and nails?
Dan in 1970 the min wage was $2.01 per hour or $364 per month. The average house cost 16,000 or $112 per month with an FHA loan. Assuming a 33% debt to income ratio, a person making min wage could buy a home. People in the 70s had very little debt, today people are burried in it. This is why you can’t use the 70s as a model.
Don’t forget about our government debt, which is nearing record levels. The FED will have no choice but to inflate away the debt, just like they did in the 70′s. They really are quite good at printing money. In about 5 years the median home price in Denver will be around $500k.
Dan in the early 1970s we did not have massive debt deflation that we have today. Japan has shown over the last 25 years that printing money may not lead to inflation. They have a debt to GDP of 220% and they still have deflation. It will also make very little sense for the government to inflate too much. The bigger issue we face is unfunded liabilities(Medicare, social security medicade) we can inflate our way out of these. The more we inflate, the more doctors, hospital and drug companies charge. Also, inflation hurts consumption and our government is the largest consumer. They buy everything from food to gasoline to battleships. If they inflate, the cost of all of these goes up. It’s a loosing proposition and zero sum game.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-04/japan-s-debt-sustains-a-deflationary-depression.html
Of course it’s a losing proposition, but there is no alternative. You can default or inflate. An individual can go bankrupt, but not America. We will always choose to inflate. It is the only politically viable option.
The US and Japan don’t seem to have issue servicing their debts. Japan 10 year is at 80bsp and ours is at 154bps. Seems to be real demand.
Meant to say In the last post, we CAN’T inflate our way out of unfunded liabilities.
Dan, I don’t think home prices will fall off a cliff any time soon. All of your rentals will do just fine over the next few year. Once prices reach the high water mark of 2006 again they will rise 1-3% per year. I also agree with you, the ability to lock in 30 fixed rate at 4% for a non owner occupied home will turn out to be a good move. But, the gains will be bumpy and then slow and steady. So, I guess my point to you Dan is, there is no need to set up a Swiss bank account or set up your rentals in the LLC in the Cayman islands any time soon.
Well, if I’m levered 10 to 1, assuming a meager 3% annual price gain, that turns my initial investment into approx a 30% annual gain. In my opinion that huge. Calculate 30% annual returns for a few years and it runs up quite a fortune.
That was the exact thinking of Lehman brother and Bear Sterns. It worked until it did not work anymore.
I would argue that the reward far outweighs the risk and it is perfectly acceptable for an individual to take the risk. A bank that draws from the FED and then get levered 90 to 1 should not be allowed to take the same risks.
For some individuals 10 to 1 leverage is acceptable for other not. I don’t think investing in RE is as foolproof as you make it out to be.
There is trillions of levered commercial real estate underwater in the US as we speak. Many will just go back to the bank if the lender does not decide they don’t want/can’t roll over the debt. if the mark to market accounting rule remained in place you would see the full extent of the problem.