Denver-area buyers snapped up almost $13 billion in homes in 2012, almost a 30 percent jump from the dollar volume in 2011, according to a report released today.
Buyers paid $12.95 billion for 46,299 homes last year, a 28.6 percent increase in the dollar volume of $10.06 billion in 2011 and a 17.5 percent from the 39,387 closings in 2011, shows the report released by independent broker Gary Bauer, who based his report on Metrolist data.
There were 56,412 homes placed under contract last year, a 19.1 percent increase from the 47,373 in 2011.
The average price of a single-family home sold in all of 2012 broke the $300,000 barrier, averaging $304,178 for the entire year, an 8.7 percent increase from the year-to-date average of $279,858 in 2011. In December, the average price of a single-family home closed was $315,451, a 14.5 percent increase from the $275,610 average in December 2011 and a 2.8 percent increase from $306,773 in November. The median price of a home sold in December was $255,000, up 11.3 percent from $230,000 in December 2011.
“It was just a great year,” Bauer said. “Buyer demand began at the beginning of the year and continued through year-end. The buyer demand is still out there. From talking to other brokers, the momentum has continued through January. The first seven days of January have been very positive.”
Metrolist, separately, released its own report on December tallies on Monday.
Both Bauer’s and the Metrolist report showed there were only 7,706 unsold homes on the market, a 29.9 percent drop from the 10,993 available homes for sale in December 2011.
The last time inventory number were in that range occurred in December 1993, when there were 7,711 homes on the market. To put that into perspective, the population of the Denver area grew 52.5 percent from 1990 to 2010, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. percent.
“Some of these numbers are absolutely staggering — the dollar volume rising 28.6 percent, the 19 percent increase in contracts and the 17.5 percent increase in closings,” said Chris Mygatt, president of Coldwell Banker Residential in Colorado.
“Why these numbers are so strong, in a big part, is because the inventory numbers are so low,” Mygatt said. “That is putting pressures on buyers and creating opportunities for sellers.”
Single-family detached homes accounted for almost 83 percent of the inventory in December, with condos accounting for about 17 percent. The single-family inventory is down almost 73 percent from its peak in January 2006, while the condo inventory has dropped almost 85 percent from its peak, noted Megan Aller, of Land Title Guarantee Co.
With supply and demand so out of whack, one might expect prices to being rising more than they have, Mygatt said.
“What I find most significant is that prices have not exploded,” Mygatt said. “I think that is going to be a key to a successful 2013 and 2014. Prices are starting to rise here, but at a reasonable and sustainable pace. That is not true in other markets. In Arizona and parts of Florida, prices already are showing double-digit gains. I just can’t help thinking: here we go again,” with another boom-bust cycle starting.
Mygatt said that consumers in the Denver area are not willing to bid up prices, like buyers are doing in Phoenix and Miami.
“Colorado buyers are more conservative by their nature and are unwilling to participate in these explosive price increases,” Mygatt said. “Even in cases where there are multiple offers for a home, a buyer in the Denver area isn’t willing to bid $50,000 more on a $240,000 house. That is happening in other markets. In Denver, a buyer might offer $5,000 more and if he is out-bid will wait for another opportunity.”
Also, while the Denver-area luxury market is improving, prices at the high-end have not risen enough to dramatically lift the average price for the overall market, he said. “Luxury homes aren’t pulling up the rest of the market,” Mygatt said.
Kirby Slunaker, president of Metrolist, said that Denver is part of a national resurgence in housing.
“All over the country, home sales in the winter months proved to be a bright spot in the headlines,” Slunaker said. He said buyers in the Denver area are signing on the dotted line quickly, so their dream homes don’t slip through their fingers.
“We’re seeing a lot of competition for homes that are available,” Slunaker said. “With an average of 73 days on the market for December home sales, we anticipate the market to remain brisk in 2013.”
A year earlier, it took 107 days to sell a home, a 32 percent increase.
Separately on Tuesday, Clear Capital, a California-based real estate data company, predicted that the home prices in the Aurora-Denver area would fall by 0.2 percent in 2013 from 2012, essentially unchanged, after showing an 11 percent year-over-year gain the fourth quarter of 2012.
Bauer said he agrees with that prediction “somewhat.”
Bauer said that while sales activity in 2013 looks good, year-over-year price increases will remain flat. He also said big questions remain on what will happen with the national economy and global events, which can impact local market. However, mortgage rates are expected to continue to hover near their historical low rates, which will keep consumers interested in buying a home, he said.
Jim Nussbaum, a broker with Kentwood Real Estate, who is entering his 43rd year of selling homes in the Denver area, said 2012 was the first year that consumer confidence has returned for the first time since the national real estate downturn began.
“There is much more confidence in the market,” Nussbaum said. “That it is really nice to see, after all of these years.”
Nussbaum estimates he sold $21 million or $22 million in homes last year. “That puts me in the top 7 percent or 8 percent of Kentwood brokers. I feel pretty good about that.”
Nussbaum even closed on a $1.3 million home on New Year’s Eve.
“It was a foreclosure, and I and the listing broker convinced the bank to put a new $50,000 roof on the house.”
Year Home closings Sales volume in billions of dollars Inflation-adjusted prices in 2011 dollars
1990 15,619 $2,411,638 $4,239,923
1991 26,410 $2,669,553 $4,434,162
1992 33,477 $3,572,215 $5,760,101
1993 35,598 $4,460,312 $6,983,086
1994 38.072 $4,779,902 $7,296,607
1995 36,038 $4,910,865 $7,289,927
1996 38,101 $5,515,801 $7,953,089
1997 40,185 $6,180,791 $8,712,027
1998 45,951 $7,775,673 $10,791,966
1999 46,742 $8,769,875 $11,908,802
2000 48,611 $10,558,877 $13,911,275
2001 47,832 $11,152,517 $14,254,428
2002 47,919 $11,713,824 $14,730,508
2003 47,966 $12,168,929 $14,961,830
2004 53,482 $14,223,031 $17,033,754
2005 53,106 $14,940,422 $17,307,562
2006 50,244 $14,516,321 $16,289,817
2007 49,789 $14,031,634 $15,309,857
2008 47,837 $11,954,290 $12,560,990
2009 42,070 $10,198,333 $10,754,177
2010 38,818 $9,976,222 $10,350,225
2011 39,387 $10,063,056 $10,257,957
2012 46,289 $12,945,247
Year January March June September December
1990 14,753 16,053 16,711 14,663 11,839
1991 11,810 13,047 13,669 12,687 10,147
1992 10,568 11,842 12,602 12,540 9,631
1993 9,076 9,020 9,500 10,349 7,711
1994 7,748 7,938 9,557 10,530 8,569
1995 8,716 9,601 11,162 11,649 9,854
1996 10,196 10,628 13,499 13,584 11,000
1997 11,011 12,240 13,844 14,247 11,093
1998 11,257 8,899 13,601 13,449 10,352
1999 9,065 8,441 9,188 10,310 8,097
2000 8,010 13,147 10,482 10,998 8,820
2001 9,540 18,322 16,826 19,180 16,482
2002 16,200 23,967 21,538 23,370 20,676
2003 21,288 24,909 26,533 26,071 21,623
2004 21,946 23,023 28,043 26,975 20,891
2005 20,917 27,309 25,817 27,200 23,572
2006 24,387 26,430 31,900 31,450 24,534
2007 24,350 26,430 30,256 30,335 24,603
2008 24,489 25,516 26,104 23,923 19,600
2009 19,748 20,628 20,853 19,834 16,456
2010 17,785 20,574 23,240 23,332 18,887
2011 18,804 19,320 19,580 17,139 12,531
2012 10,443 10,325 10,925 10,470 7,707
Source: Gary Bauer, Metrolist
Have a story idea or real estate tip? Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com. InsideRealEstateNews.com is sponsored by Universal Lending, Land Title Guarantee and 8z Real Estate. To read more articles by John Rebchook, subscribe to the Colorado Real Estate Journal.
< class="related_post_title">Related Posts:>















Seems like we’re way ahead of the national trend. Do you think it’s our education, climate, economy or some other factor?
Good questions, Bill.
What do readers think?
Can we revisit this idiocy in 1 year? “…Tuesday, Clear Capital…predicted that the home prices… would fall by 0.2 percent”
Current inventory is at 2+ months.
If inventory explodes, then yes prices might decrease.
But, inventory will not increase if prices fall. Everyone will hunker down again. House owners have demonstrated that they do not NEED to sell.
Colorado is still gaining people. See http://www.newgeography.com/content/003359-moving-north-dakota-the-new-census-estimates
New York and California are losing people.
When those people arrive in Colorado, they laugh at the low house prices here. Are they going to drive prices down? I think not.
@dave-Due to many factors like, down payment constraints, wages, loan requirements, appraisals ect. housing prices become fairly inelastic. It would not shock me to see home prices fall a small amount this year. Supply and demand is tricky in residential home sales. Between 2000-2005, Denver saw prices gains with inventory peaking at over 35,000 homes on the market. At that time, there was a 8 month supply and prices still rose.
I also disagree with many people who think homes will flood the market this spring. When listings get to this low of a level, it becomes difficult to get people to list(also, remember of the 6,300 single family homes on the market, 1,000 are over $1,000,000). Most people need to sell their current home before buying the next. But, with such low inventory this process of listing your house, looking for a replacement home while your current home is on the market, getting both under contract and closing with in 3 day of each other becomes very problematic. It’s forcing many move up buyer to the sidelines, thus, limiting listings and causing a negative feedback loop.
I actually think that appraisals will help push prices UP. Appraisals, by definition, lag the market.
I would just say an appraiser can nix a deal that a willing seller and a willing buyer negotiated. It’s not a real free market when an appraiser act as a price regulator.
Also, keep in mind total US student loan debt just topped $1 Trillion. To put that number in perspective the total US mortgage debt is $8 Trillion. No wonder so many 25 year old are living at home in the basement.
@Dave
The median price in LA is $360k. Do you really think they get too excited about home prices when they get to Denver?
I was thinking more along the lines of the 75% with LA at $600 and Denver at $500K. Also, the people that I know personally who live in CA and/or have left have houses in the $900+K level.
Nice Chart!
Clear capital, whoever that is, is predicting a 0.2% drop in prices for Denver in 2012. LOL, I wonder what Clear capital predicted for 2012. I wonder if Clear Capital even had a prediction for 2012. They are either completely clueless or they are expecting a recession mid year. (it appears that their primary business is doing BPOs for Mortgage companies, so I am going with ‘clueless’)
$21MM in homes in one year, that’s a lot of sales for one agent (I am guessing his average sale is far north of a million).
Here was Clear Capital’s 2012 prediction.
http://www.clearcapital.com/jobs/MarketReport.cfm?month=January&year=2012
They had Denver up 1.8%
I’m guessing Case Shiller will show Denver up 6% YoY when there December number is released in March.
Case shiller will be over 7% yoy for December. The Clear Capital prediction is laughable. Last June Zillow predicted Denver prices to grow 1.6% yoy, then four months later, when they realized that Denver was booming, they quickly changed their prediction o over 10% yoy. Will be the same with Clear Capital when they stop looking at their flawed metrics and simply take a look at what’s happening.
JohnD- What do you think Denver’s 2013 YoY return will be using Case Shiller data?
DJ-same question…
Which month’s data? (and not the month it comes out, but the month it applies to)
@dj
The calendar YoY rate of change for 2013. Comparing Jan 2013 to Dec 2013. the December 2013 number would come out in March 2014.
It will be around 9%
Clear Capital are incompetent idiots.
Their 2012 forecast for Sacramento was -3.3%
According to http://www.deptofnumbers.com/asking-prices/california/sacramento/ asking prices have climbed 45% in 2012.
Now, I know that asking and sold prices are not the same. But, they are in the same ballpark.
And Trulia says “The median sales price for homes in Sacramento CA for Sep 12 to Nov 12 was $154,000. This represents an increase of 23.2% compared to the prior year.”
I’m guessing all the residents moving to Denver from California’s capitol city are are not laughing at the “low prices” here in Denver. More like crying…….
I am predicting denver 2013
up 5.7% case shiller
This i great to hear. I am glad homes are seller better now. I know my parents will be happy to hear about this since they have had their house on the market for a while now.
All of the comments are interesting. we will see more sales and closings in 2013 than 2012. There will not be an over built inventory. There are not enough finished home sites to meet market demand. Apartment occupancy is high which will promote higher rents thereby also fueling the for sale existing and new home sales markets!
With low interest rates, job formation, construction material and labor shortages there will be an increase of prices.
ONwards and UPwards!
Unless inventory level rise significantly, there is now way we will see a higher number on sales in 2013.
SPutter and SIdeways!