Highlights:
- Case-Shiller shows Denver home prices up 8.5%
- That is the biggest percentage gain since October 2001.
- Inventory shortage remains the biggest concern for Realtors.
The Denver-area housing market showed a 8.5 percent year-over-year gain last December, according to the closely watched Case-Shiller index released today.
That was the biggest year-over-year percentage gain in more than 11 years. The last time it was higher was in October 2001, when home prices rose by 8.9 percent.
Overall, the percentage gain was good enough for 10th place of the 20 major metropolitan statistical areas tracked in the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices. The overall annual percentage gain in December for the 20 MSAs was 6.8 percent.
In December 2011, Denver ranked No. 2, with a 0.4 percent loss, a sign of how much the nation’s market has recovered. In December of last year, New York was the only city to show a loss, dropping by 0.5 percent. Phoenix led the pack, rising by 23 percent.
On a month-to-month basis, Denver fell by 0.3 percent, on a non-seasonally adjusted basis.
“The non-seasonally adjusted index dropped slightly from November to December, but the seasonally adjusted index was up a strong 0.8 percent,” said Lane Hornung, CEO and co-founder of 8z Real Estate. “With annual appreciation jumping to 8.5 percent, I will repeat my prediction from last month that the Denver MSA will post a double-digit appreciation number some time this spring.”
However, the Denver-area market needs more homes to sell, he and other brokers say. With fewer than 7,100 unsold resale homes on the market in January, the inventory of available homes is believed to be at the lowest level since the 1970s.
“The market desperately needs inventory,” Hornung said.
“To avoid entering a bubble market (and we all know how that turns out), perhaps we need to broadcast the following public service announcement: “Calling all sellers, calling all sellers-now is a good time to sell!”
Peter Niederman, CEO of Kentwood Real Estate, said he is glad that Denver’s housing market is not showing the big gains of places such as Phoenix, although he is glad that the national housing market is recovering.
“I think the best commentary is not that Denver is in the middle of the pack, but all markets are starting to rise,” Niederman said. “I like where Denver is. It is right where it should be. Denver is performing wonderfully.”
It was not that long ago, he noted, that “we were talking about Denver bucking the national trend. Now, we are seeing this breadth of improvement across all markets. That is very healthy for the overall housing economy and the U.S. economy. It’s like that old saying — a rising tide lifts all boats.”
He said if Denver homes showed the kind of appreciation that the Phoenix market is enjoying, he would be worried.
“I would be very cautious if Denver was in the top five markets right now,” Niederman said. If prices went go up too fast, too soon, it makes the market unaffordable. Companies looking to locate here or grow here, would have second thoughts if homes were too expensive. It also would price many people out of the market.”
The average price of a single-family home sold and closed in January was slightly more than $300,000.
On national news reports, Niederman noted that economist Robert Shiller, co-creator of Case-Shiller, said that a shortage of homes has become a concern in many markets across the country, Niederman said.
“Shiller said new home builders are helping to fill the gap, but they aren’t building homes fast enough,” Niederman said.
“In Denver, builders are definitely help fill the void,” Niederman said. “It’s a tale of two stories. On one level, new homes are competition for homes we are trying to sell. On the other hand, they are creating new supply. A big concern is that people will sell their homes quickly and won’t be able to find another one. In many cases, they can move into a new home, after selling their existing home.”
Builders also are constructing homes that consumers want, he said.
“They build to meet the demand,” Niederman said. “It’s not the super-luxury home builders that are doing the best, but the builders who are constructing homes that are priced at a level where the demand exists. New homes are a good option for someone selling their existing home.”
Independent broker Gary Bauer said the Case-Shiller report shows that Denver is in a very good place relative to other national markets.
“Once again, Denver did not experience the very high peaks nor did it experience the very low valleys like many of these other markets, which are now showing bigger percentage gains than Denver,” Bauer said.
“Slow and steady is much better than these huge swings other markets are showing,” he said.
He agreed with other brokers that the inventory is the biggest problem currently facing the Denver market.
“Soon we will have the February numbers (from Metrolist) and it will be interesting to see if we see another decline in the number of houses on the market,” Bauer said.
“All the Realtors I talk to are putting shoe-leather on the street, ringing door bells and talking to homeowners about why now is a great time to be putting your home on the market. Hopefully, their efforts will pay off and we will start to see an increase in the supply to help us meet the demand.”
The national housing market ended last year on a strong said, according to David M. Blitzer, chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices.
“Home prices ended 2012 with solid gains,” Blitzer said “Housing and residential construction led the economy in the 2012 fourth quarter. In December’s report all three headline composites and 19 of the 20 cities gained over their levels of a year ago. Month-over-month, nine cities and both composites posted positive monthly gains. Seasonally adjusted, there were no monthly declines across all 20 cities.
“The National Composite increased 7.3 percent over the four quarters of 2012. From its low in the first quarter, it surged in the second and third quarter and slipped slightly in the 2012 fourth period. The 10- and 20-City Composites, which bottomed out in March 2012 continued to show both year-over-year and monthly gains in December. These movements, combined with other housing data, suggest that while housing is on the upswing some of the strongest numbers may have already been seen.
“Atlanta and Detroit posted their biggest year-over-year increases of 9.9 percent and 13.6 percent since the start of their indices in January 1991. Dallas, Denver, and Minneapolis recorded their largest annual increases since 2001. Phoenix continued its climb, posting an impressive year-over-year return of 23.0 percent; it posted eight consecutive months of double-digit annual growth.”
Metropolitan Area Change from January 2000 December-January Change 1-Year Annual Change
Atlanta -3.0% 1.0% 13.4%
Boston 53.8% 0.0% 4.0%
Charlotte 15.15% 0.2% 6.0%
Chicago 11.62% -0.9% 3.3%
Cleveland 0.07% -0.5% 4.8%
Dallas 20.51% 0.0% 7.0%
DENVER 34.17% 0.0% 9.2%
Detroit -19.99% -0.9% 13.8%
Las Vegas 4.04% 1.6% 15.3%
Los Angeles 80.23% 0.9% 12.1%
Miami 53.51% 0.8% 10.8%
Minneapolis 24.95% -0.5% 12.1%
New York 61.64% 0.1% 0.6%
Phoenix 26.69% 1.1% 23.2%
Portland 40.74% -0.4% 8.3%
San Diego 63.28% -0.6% 9.8%
San Francisco 47.45% 0.1% 17.5%
Seattle 41.30% -0.3% 8.7%
Tampa 35.20% 0.9% 8.9%
Washington, D.C. 87.42% -0.7% 5.9%
Composite -10 58.72% 0.2% 7.3%
Composite - 20 46.14% 0.1% 8.1%
[table "257" not found /]
Have a story idea or real estate tip? Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com. InsideRealEstateNews.com is sponsored by Universal Lending, Land Title Guarantee and 8z Real Estate. To read more articles by John Rebchook, subscribe to the Colorado Real Estate Journal.
< class="related_post_title">Related Posts:>
















“All the Realtors I talk to are putting shoe-leather on the street, ringing door bells and talking to homeowners about why now is a great time to be putting your home on the market”.
I wonder if the conversation would go something like this-
Joe Realtor: Hi, I’m Joe realtor. I wanted to come by to let you know it’s a great time to sell your home.
Jane Homeowner: Why is that?
Joe Realtor: There have never been so few homes on the market as a percentage of the total home pool. If we don’t get some homes on the market, prices may rise too fast.
Jane Homeowner: Rising prices. Sounds good to me. Why would I want to sell now if prices are rising?
Joe Realtor: Well Jane, the price of the next home you buy will rise as well.
Jane Homeowner: Not so fast Joe, I plane to use 5 to 1 leverage on the next home, so I get to keep 80% of the additional money I made from rising prices because I waited. I do need a big screen for the next home. Also, a vacation is in order after a move like this. I need to wait to get the extra cash.
Joe Realtor: It’s a great time to sell now because, I can sell you home in 2 hours.
Jane Homeowner: Than what? I have no home to move into? There are no homes on the market. I can find what I want and make a decision in two hours for the next home.
Joe Realtor: Need to move now. Rates have never been lower, they can only go up from here….
Jane homeowner: Oh Joe, you must not read John Rebchook’s blog Inside Real Estate News. He just reported Professor Tom Thibodeau said rates will not rise in his lifetime. So, perhaps you should come back and speak to me when Professor Thibodeau passes away.
Joe Realtor: Sounds Good, I will come back then.
Jason,
You made me laugh.
You the part about sell your home in 2 hours and then live in your car.
5 days later…..
Joe Realtor: Knock, Knock….
Jane Homeowner:Well hello Joe! Did Professor Thibodeau pass away?
Joe Realtor: No, I think he is teaching a class on the mortgage interest deduction this morning…..
Jane Homeowner: What can I do for you today, Joe?
Joe Realtor: My managing broker made me come back to let you know Jenny Realtor in our office has a all cash buyer ready to buy your home.
Jane Homeowner: Joe, we went over this the other day. I don’t want to sell…
Joe Realtor: Now is the best time to sell. This is about as good at it will get for real estate. The FED is buying $85B a month in MBS securities, keeping rates low. Between FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the govt. backs 97% of all home loans originated. FHA will allow 3.5% down with a 620 FICO score(even lower with manual underwriting) and a 43% DTI. The spigot is wide open……
Jane Homeowner: Is all the liquidity and subsidies sustainable in the long run?
Joe Realtor: Of course it is…. We have been able to manipulate the real estate market for decades. For example, even before the sham loans like no money down/ no income/no asset/ no job loan, we had my favorite scam ever. You will love this one. n 2001-2005, FHA required a 3% down payment and we were having a hard time finding buyers to come up with that much cash upfront. Well, some smart guy read that FHA would allow a non profit charity to “donate” all the down payment funds to a buyer. So, this guy starts a 501c(3) and had the seller of the house raise the price of the home by 3% and “donate” 3% plus $2000 to his “charity” then “charity” give the money back to the buyer. Bingo! A no money down FHA loan. The seller sells, the buyers needs no money down, the “charity” owner get $2000 and pays himself a huge salary, the broker get 6%, the house is sold for 3% over market value and the tax payer is on the hook….. We have gamed the system before and we will gain it again. No need to worry.. So can I list your home for sale?
Jane Homeowner: Joe, you have been very persuasive today. Unfortunately for you, all of your good information has convinced me I don’t need a listing agent to sell my home. I will be putting up a for sale by owner and not taking offers for at least 2 week to make sure I get enough exposure to the market. Since all I hear about is multiple offers I should be able get fairly close market clearing price without you. I even have a 3% cushion since I’m not paying you. So, let Jenny Realtor from your office know offers will be entertaining offers for the next two weeks and i will be happy to pay her a 3.5% co-op. I fell like I can give Jenny a little extra since I don’t have to pay you. Thanks again Joe!!!!
2 hours later Jane Hownowner calls Joe Realtor at the office….
Joe Realtor: Hello, this is Joe Realtor….
Jane homeowner: Hi Joe, can you let Jenny Realtor know that the winning buyer will be responsible to pay my attorney up to $700 to review all the contracts and attend closing. Also, I will only pay up to $400 in inspection items to be fixed. I’m sure this will not be an issue. I know how much time Jenny has been driving these buyers around only to loose out on another home to a competing offer. My guess is, if the buyer won’t pay, Jenny will.
Joe Realtor: I will let her know.
Jane Homeowner: thanks Joe, have a great day.
http://www.deptofnumbers.com/asking-prices/colorado/denver/ is forecasting a drop in inventory for FEB vs JAN.
saw that. Yes, small but significant, and surprising, decline from Jan. All the buyers that did not want to ‘catch a falling knife’ a year ago, are jumping into the market now, 8.5% higher.
Despite what Bernake might say in public, gov purchase of MBS has to decline and interest rates have to rise throughout the year. I put a house on the market last week for $250,000, had an offer 1st day for $247,000, probably could have gotten more if wanted to wait, but I am worried that it is not going to appraise for even $247,000. At the 2006 market peak that house would have only sold for about $240,000.
. “With annual appreciation jumping to 8.5 percent, I will repeat my prediction from last month that the Denver MSA will post a double-digit appreciation number some time this spring.”
Lane, no need to repeat. As long as we home prices don’t fall over the next 2 case Shiller reports, we will be up 10% in Feb 2013. In Feb 2012, according to Case Shiller, it was the 3rd time Denver hit the cycle low(C/S index Feb 2012- 121.81 Feb 2011 -120.26 Feb 2009-120.21). The real question for you is, what the YoY number will be in July? The December Case Shiller reading of 134.14 shows Denver only a little over 1% higher than July 2012. Tough to blame seasonality with so few listings on the market.
But Denver’s Non seasonally adjusted numbers almost always fall in Dec, jan, Feb. The non seasonally adjusted numbers actually fell last month about 0.3%, it is just that the seasonal adjustment for Dec is a lot bigger than 0.3%. As best as I can tell, the Case shiller seasonal adjustment from Dec to Feb is 2.3%, so in order not to fall, the non seasonally adjusted numbers would have to our perform the Dec-Feb norm by 2.3%! I am not saying that is impossible, just seems unlikely to me.
Question for DJ and JohnD. I understand the reason for a substainial seasonal ajustment for MLS due to mix of home sold, but why does Case Shiller need a large ajustment. It’s comparing paired sales of the same home. In your expirence, how much more(in % terms) would the exact same home sell for in December rather than June? By the way, I do respect what you guys have to say. You both know the market very well. DJ and I just have a different view on inflation expectations.
Appraisers and most realtors try to ignore seasonality and say there is no difference. It is clear to me that normal seasonality affects prices by about 5% in Denver. That being said, this year seems to have less of an effect, or perhaps prices just remained flat rather than falling as they usually do during the winter months.
I am really thinking of this on a micro level. You surely don’t think you would get 5% less for the same house sold in January opposed to June?
@ Jason Yes, I would say that a house sold in January would sell for 5% (I would say 3.5%) less than it would sell in June, in a flat market
Absolutely!