<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inside Real Estate News &#187; Ryan McMaken</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/tag/ryan-mcmaken/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com</link>
	<description>Colorado&#039;s Real Estate News Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:51:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado foreclosures down 15%</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2011/07/colorado-foreclosures-down-15/</link>
		<comments>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2011/07/colorado-foreclosures-down-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 06:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Rebchook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Denver Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Division of Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McMaken]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=13125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It's clear at this point that so far in the year, Colorado's foreclosure activity is well below what it was last year," Ryan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_12710" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 90px"><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Ryan-McMaken.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-12710 " style="margin: 5px;" title="Ryan McMaken" src="http://insiderealestatenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Ryan-McMaken.jpg" alt="" width="80" height="80" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ryan McMaken of the Colorado Division of Housing.</p></div>
<p>Total foreclosure activity in Colorado in the first half of the year dropped 14.7 percent from the same period last year, but that still ranked the state No. 9 in foreclosures, according to a national report released today by RealtyTrac.<span id="more-13125"></span></p>
<p>The U.S. as a whole showed a 28.3 percent drop on a year-over-year basis, according to the California-based company.</p>
<p>In Colorado, it showed 26,744 total foreclosure filings, or one out of every 84 housing units. That compared with one out of every 111 housing units being in some state of foreclosure nationally. RealtyTrac’s methodology covers everything from the first foreclosure notice until it becomes an REO, or Real Estate Owned, when the bank buys it a public trustee auction.</p>
<p>Ryan McMaken, spokesman for the Colorado Division of Housing, early next month will be releasing his own report, using a different methodology than RealtyTrac.</p>
<p><strong>Foreclosures on pace for 20% drop</strong></p>
<p>“My data for the first half of 2011 is incomplete, but if current trends keep up, it looks like Colorado is on track to end 2011 down about 20 percent down from 2010&#8242;s totals.,” McMaken said. “This is somewhat due to many lenders&#8217; policy of slowing down foreclosure processing, but that doesn&#8217;t appear to be the only reason, since Mortgage Banker Association data also shows fewer loans becoming delinquent in Colorado.”</p>
<p>Indeed, RealtyTrac’s numbers and the MBA’s analysis, seem to paint different pictures of Colorado’s foreclosure standing, compared with other parts of the country.</p>
<p>“As far as the state-to-state comparisons are concerned, the same disparity continues between Realtytrac&#8217;s rankings and those published by the MBA,” McMaken said. “In MBA&#8217;s data, Colorado ranks about 35th in delinquencies and foreclosure inventory, while in Realtytrac&#8217;s data, the state regularly ranks 9th or 10th in foreclosure activity.”</p>
<p>Still, the two national reports show similar trends.</p>
<p>“Realtytrac&#8217;s year-over-year changes reflect a similar trend, although to a slightly smaller extent,” McMaken said. “Nevertheless, it&#8217;s clear at this point that so far in the year, Colorado&#8217;s foreclosure activity is well below what it was last year.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/09/colorado-ranked-no-8-in-foreclosures/" title="Colorado ranked No. 8 in foreclosures">Colorado ranked No. 8 in foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/07/mcmaken-finds-realtytracs-numbers-plausible/" title="McMaken finds RealtyTrac&#039;s numbers &quot;plausible&quot;">McMaken finds RealtyTrac&#039;s numbers &quot;plausible&quot;</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2011/06/colorado-no-10-in-foreclosures/" title="Colorado No. 10 in foreclosures">Colorado No. 10 in foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2011/05/foreclosures-fall-27/" title="Foreclosures fall 27%">Foreclosures fall 27%</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2011/03/foreclosure-hit-30-month-low/" title="Foreclosure hit 30-month low">Foreclosure hit 30-month low</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2011/07/colorado-foreclosures-down-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreclosures fall 29.5%</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/08/foreclosures-fall-29-5/</link>
		<comments>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/08/foreclosures-fall-29-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Rebchook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Division of Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure Filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McMaken]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=7190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Since foreclosure activity is so closely tied to wages and employment right now, the trend in filings could change at any time in response to the overall strength of the economy," Ryan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is the worst over for foreclosures? Take a poll at the end of this blog.</strong></p>
<p>Foreclosure filings in Colorado&#8217;s largest counties plunged by 29.5  in July from July 2009, the fourth consecutive month this year that foreclosure activity has dropped from the comparable month last year, according to a state report released today.<span id="more-7190"></span></p>
<p>The Department of Local Affairs’ Division of Housing reported that monthly foreclosure filings totals have been down year-over-year every month since April. Foreclosure sales at auction fell 15.4 percent during July as compared to July of last year.</p>
<p>There were 2,718 new foreclosure filings in July compared with 3,855 filings in July 2009. There were 1,581 foreclosure sales during July, and 1,869 foreclosure sales in July of last year.</p>
<p>From June to July this year, foreclosure filings rose 0.2 percent, and foreclosure sales at auction fell 10.9 percent. Foreclosure filings are the initial filing that begins the foreclosure process, and foreclosure sales totals are the total number of foreclosures that have been sold at auction at the end of the foreclosure process.</p>
<p><strong>Downward trend</strong></p>
<p>“We continue to see a generally downward trend in both new filings and foreclosure sales at auction,” said Ryan McMaken, a spokesperson for the Colorado Division of Housing. “The decline in sales at auction can be attributed at least in part to the success of programs like the Foreclosure Hotline. However, since foreclosure activity is so closely tied to wages and employment right now, the trend in filings could change at any time in response to the overall strength of the economy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Foreclosure activity varied by county. The counties with the largest decreases in foreclosure filings from July 2009 to July 2010 were Weld and Denver, where filings decreased by 38 percent and 39 percent, respectively. Mesa County was the only county surveyed where filings increased. Year-over-year filings in Mesa County increased by 24.6 percent.</p>
<p>Year-over-year, Mesa County was also the only county to report an increase in foreclosure sales at auction. Sales increased 133.3 percent in Mesa County year-over-year. Sales fell most in Larimer County and El Paso County where they decreased by 31.1 percent and 32.4 percent, respectively.</p>
<p>The county with the highest rate of foreclosure sales was Weld County with a rate of 598 households per foreclosure sale. Mesa County came in second with 660 households per foreclosure sale. The lowest rate was found in Boulder County where there were 2,966 households per foreclosure sale. The largest increase in foreclosure rates since 2009 was found in Mesa County where the foreclosure rate increased from 1,540 households per foreclosure to 660 households per foreclosure, year-over-year.</p>
<p>The Division of Housing’s monthly foreclosure report surveys foreclosure activity in the 12 largest counties of Colorado. The report is a supplement to the division’s quarterly foreclosure report that includes all counties in Colorado.</p>
<p><strong>
<table id="wp-table-reloaded-id-118-no-1" class="wp-table-reloaded wp-table-reloaded-id-118">
<thead>
	<tr class="row-1 odd">
		<th class="column-1">County</th><th class="column-2">July 09</th><th class="column-3">July 10</th><th class="column-4">% Change</th>
	</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
	<tr class="row-2 even">
		<td class="column-1">Adams</td><td class="column-2">490</td><td class="column-3">350</td><td class="column-4">-28.6</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-3 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Arapahoe</td><td class="column-2">590</td><td class="column-3">435</td><td class="column-4">-26.3</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-4 even">
		<td class="column-1">Boulder</td><td class="column-2">145</td><td class="column-3">99</td><td class="column-4">-31.7</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-5 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Broomfield</td><td class="column-2">34</td><td class="column-3">31</td><td class="column-4">-8.8</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-6 even">
		<td class="column-1">Denver</td><td class="column-2">634</td><td class="column-3">387</td><td class="column-4">-39.0</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-7 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Douglas</td><td class="column-2">222</td><td class="column-3">162</td><td class="column-4">-27.0</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-8 even">
		<td class="column-1">El Paso</td><td class="column-2">530</td><td class="column-3">353</td><td class="column-4">-33.4</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-9 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Jefferson</td><td class="column-2">390</td><td class="column-3">295</td><td class="column-4">-24.1</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-10 even">
		<td class="column-1">Larimer</td><td class="column-2">232</td><td class="column-3">156</td><td class="column-4">-32.8</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-11 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Mesa</td><td class="column-2">130</td><td class="column-3">162</td><td class="column-4">24.6</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-12 even">
		<td class="column-1">Pueblo</td><td class="column-2">137</td><td class="column-3">88</td><td class="column-4">-35.8</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-13 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Weld</td><td class="column-2">321</td><td class="column-3">199</td><td class="column-4">-38.0</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-14 even">
		<td class="column-1">Total</td><td class="column-2">3855</td><td class="column-3">2718</td><td class="column-4">-29.5</td>
	</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.</strong></p>
<p>The full report is available on the Division of Housing blog:<a href=" http://divisionofhousing.blogspot.com/" target="_self"> http://divisionofhousing.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p><strong>Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com</strong></p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2011/07/colorado-foreclosures-down-15/" title="Colorado foreclosures down 15%">Colorado foreclosures down 15%</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/foreclosure-filings-fall-sales-skyrocket/" title="Foreclosure filings fall, sales skyrocket">Foreclosure filings fall, sales skyrocket</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/09/colorado-ranked-no-8-in-foreclosures/" title="Colorado ranked No. 8 in foreclosures">Colorado ranked No. 8 in foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/08/apartment-vacancies-rise-statewide/" title="Apartment vacancies rise statewide">Apartment vacancies rise statewide</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/07/mcmaken-finds-realtytracs-numbers-plausible/" title="McMaken finds RealtyTrac&#039;s numbers &quot;plausible&quot;">McMaken finds RealtyTrac&#039;s numbers &quot;plausible&quot;</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/08/foreclosures-fall-29-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RealtyTrac&#8217;s foreclosure data wrong, state officials says</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/08/realtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says/</link>
		<comments>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/08/realtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Rebchook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Division of Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RealtyTrac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McMaken]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=6897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A top state housing official today published a report criticizing the way that Irvine, Calf.-based RealtyTrac counts foreclosures in Colorado.  RealtyTrac&#8217;s conclusion that foreclosure activity in Colorado rose in the second quarter from the same period in 2009, is simply incorrect, said Ryan McMaken, spokesman for the Colorado Division of Housing.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m certainly not trying to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[if IE]><iframe frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" class="addtoany_special_service google_plusone" src="https://plusone.google.com/u/0/_/%2B1/fastbutton?url=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F08%2Frealtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says%2F&amp;size=medium&amp;count=false" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:32px;height:20px"></iframe><![endif]--><!--[if !IE]><!--><iframe class="addtoany_special_service google_plusone" src="https://plusone.google.com/u/0/_/%2B1/fastbutton?url=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F08%2Frealtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says%2F&amp;size=medium&amp;count=false" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:32px;height:20px"></iframe><!--<![endif]--><!--[if IE]><iframe frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" class="addtoany_special_service twitter_tweet" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.html?url=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F08%2Frealtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says%2F&amp;counturl=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F08%2Frealtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says%2F&amp;count=none&amp;text=RealtyTrac%26%238217%3Bs%20foreclosure%20data%20wrong%2C%20state%20officials%20says" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:55px;height:20px"></iframe><![endif]--><!--[if !IE]><!--><iframe class="addtoany_special_service twitter_tweet" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.html?url=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F08%2Frealtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says%2F&amp;counturl=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F08%2Frealtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says%2F&amp;count=none&amp;text=RealtyTrac%26%238217%3Bs%20foreclosure%20data%20wrong%2C%20state%20officials%20says" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:55px;height:20px"></iframe><!--<![endif]--><!--[if IE]><iframe frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" class="addtoany_special_service facebook_like" src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F08%2Frealtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=75&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=20&amp;ref=addtoany" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:90px;height:21px"></iframe><![endif]--><!--[if !IE]><!--><iframe class="addtoany_special_service facebook_like" src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F08%2Frealtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=75&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=20&amp;ref=addtoany" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:90px;height:21px"></iframe><!--<![endif]--><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F08%2Frealtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says%2F&amp;title=RealtyTrac%26%238217%3Bs%20foreclosure%20data%20wrong%2C%20state%20officials%20says" id="wpa2a_2">Share/Bookmark</a></p><p>A top state housing official today published a report criticizing the way that Irvine, Calf.-based RealtyTrac counts foreclosures in Colorado.  RealtyTrac&#8217;s conclusion that foreclosure activity in Colorado rose in the second quarter from the same period in 2009, is simply incorrect, said Ryan McMaken, spokesman for the Colorado Division of Housing.<span id="more-6897"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m certainly not trying to pick a fight with RealtyTrac,&#8221; McMaken said. &#8220;But after reading a report today in Business Week, it was just wrong and I felt like I needed to respond.&#8221;</p>
<p>In addition to his analysis that he wrote today &#8211; spurred by the Business Week article that quoted RealtyTrac information lumping Colorado with other states showing percentage increases &#8211; McMaken also plans to release a short YouTube video explaining the difference between what he does when researching foreclosure activity, compared with RealtyTrac. McMaken surveys every public trustee office in Colorado for precise counts, while RealtyTrac apparently samples data from various counties. He said its exact methodology remains a &#8220;mystery.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Differences significant</strong></p>
<p>In the second quarter, McMaken&#8217;s numbers show a year-over-year drop of about 16 percent, while RealtyTrac shows about a 4.7 percent increase. &#8220;That&#8217;s a pretty significant difference,&#8221; McMaken said.</p>
<p>RealtyTrac and the state have butted heads from time-to-time since the mid-1980s, when RealtyTrac apparently was counting transactions more than once, which led to Colorado being viewed as the poster child for the foreclosure crisis in the nation. For years, Colorado and the Denver area were in the top five, often in first place, for having the dubious distinction of having the highest percentage increases of foreclosure activity in the nation, according to RealtyTrac. Indeed, it was true that the foreclosure woes began earlier in Colorado than in most other states &#8211; California, for example, had relatively few foreclosure until the housing bubble burst &#8211; but Colorado housing experts claimed that RealtyTrac was dramatically over-counting foreclosure activity, making a terrible situation look even worse.</p>
<p>RealtyTrac, however, changes its ways of counting foreclosures in Colorado, and now doesn&#8217;t over-count the way did in past years, McMaken said.</p>
<p><strong>Not intentionally misleading</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not saying there is any kind of nefarious plan at work here,&#8221; McMaken said. &#8220;I know early on some of us were guilty of thinking they ran the numbers up, so they could sell more listing lists, or something. But I have no evidence of that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed, in some quarters he believes RealtyTrac has under-counted foreclosures in Colorado and other quarters over-counts them. If it under-counts them one quarter, that can lead to percentage gains that are not true, he said.</p>
<p><strong>Methodology flawed</strong></p>
<p>He also thinks that its methodology is flawed, as it adds together every part of the foreclosure process &#8211; from the initial filing to the public trustee sale &#8211; to arrive at their numbers. But the reality is that these numbers often move independently of each other. However, even McMaken has lumped all of the numbers together, he said he has been unable to duplicate RealtyTrac&#8217;s numbers, and, thus its conclusions.</p>
<p><strong>RealtyTrac responds</strong></p>
<div>Daren Blomquist, a spokesman for RealtyTrac, said that he is happy to speak with Colorado Division of Housing officials. &#8220;That is something we have offered to do in the past,&#8221; Blomquist said. &#8220;It&#8217;s a little disappointing that this is the way we hear about it We are more than happy to work with them and make sure our data is presented in the most accurate way. We have worked with them in the past in the way we present out data.&#8221; He also notes that RealtyTrac&#8217;s data is not based on samplings, but actual numbers from the vast majority of the Colorado counties.</div>
<div>That said, however, Blomquist said that McMaken does &#8220;make some good points about the nature of foreclosure notices.&#8221; For the past few months, RealtyTrac increasingly has been providing separate data on the filing and the REOs. He noted that filings in many parts of the country are going down, while the REOs &#8211; which in Colorado would be defined as the sale at the public trustee auction back to the lender, and not to a third-party &#8211; are rising.</div>
<div>&#8220;Back near the beginning of the foreclosure cycle, it was pretty much heading upwards for everything, but now we seeing divergent trends,&#8221; he said. In its most recent report, Colorado&#8217;s foreclosure rank was No. 13, while a few years ago it was often in the top five. &#8220;If I was going to count the top tier states on one hand, I would say they are Nevada, Arizona, California and Florida,&#8221; Blomquist said. &#8220;While early on Colorado was a top tier state, I would no longer consider it a top-tier state for foreclosures.&#8221;</div>
<div><strong>McMaken makes his case</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div>Here is McMaken&#8217;s article, detailing his problems with RealtyTrac.</div>
<p>&#8220;In recent wire stories referencing Realtytrac&#8217;s second quarter foreclosure statistics, it has been noted that &#8220;Foreclosure filings rose in the second quarter in Idaho, Illinois, Utah, and Colorado compared with a year earlier.&#8221;</p>
<p>The reporting in the Bloomberg/BusinessWeek article is based on recently released foreclosure data from Realtytrac, but Realtytrac&#8217;s data is incorrect.</p>
<p>The year-over-year change during the second quarter in Colorado is actually negative, while Realtytrac reports growth. This is an example of incorrect and potentially misleading data coming out of a Realtytrac report.</p>
<p>In this article, I will examine how Realtytrac&#8217;s reported numbers for the second quarter do not match up with the numbers reported by the public trustees in Colorado, and how Realtytrac&#8217;s practice of combining foreclosure filings totals with foreclosure sales totals leads to errors in interpreting the data.</p>
<p><strong>Realtytrac Method</strong></p>
<p>The details of Realtytrac&#8217;s data collection methods remain a mystery. The press releases note that Realtytrac engages in sampling: &#8220;Data is collected from more than 2,200 counties nationwide, and those counties account for more than 90 percent of the U.S. population.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is unknown from which Colorado counties Realtytrac samples its data. The quarterly foreclosure reports provided by the Division of Housing, however, collect complete data on foreclosure activity directly from public trustees in all counties in Colorado. The public trustee is the county office responsible for administering foreclosure filings and auctions in Colorado.</p>
<p>In spite of a lack of information about collection methods, we can nevertheless glean some information from the published press releases. Based on the data it does report publicly, the numbers put forward as the statewide number for Colorado is based on the number of &#8220;Notices of Trustee Sales&#8221; (NTS) added to the number of &#8220;Real Estate Owned&#8221; (REO) filings. (RealtyTrac adds together what it calls NTS and REOs to arrive at a total)</p>
<p>In Colorado, what Realtytrac calls NTS is known as the Notice of Election and Demand (NED), and what Realtytrac calls REO is in Colorado commonly referred to as a foreclosure &#8220;sale at auction&#8221; or &#8220;certificate of purchase.</p>
<p>Here we see our first problem with Realtytrac&#8217;s analysis.</p>
<p>By adding together the NED total and the sale number, and then basing foreclosure rates and trends on the combined number, Realtytrac is obscuring essential information that is key to accurate analysis of foreclosure trends in the state.</p>
<p><strong>Independent stats</strong></p>
<p>This is because the NED number and the sale number are two completely independent statistics, and often trend in opposite directions. For example, between April 2009 and April 2010, foreclosure sales at auction showed a generally upward trend, and overall they increased by about 45 percent. During the same period, NEDs showed a generally downward trend and showed an overall decrease during the period of about 16 percent.</p>
<p>NEDs and sales are affected differently by changes in the economic environment and should not be combined. NEDs are a leading indicator of economic pressures that produce foreclosures, while foreclosure sales are a trailing indicator. NEDs represent the beginning of the foreclosure process, while foreclosure sales represent the end.</p>
<p>It is not difficult to see that if NEDs are rising, but foreclosure sales are falling, that, all things being equal, one would expect to see a future rise in foreclosure sales. On the other hand, if NEDs are falling, but sales are rising, we would expect to see a fall in sales activity a few months down the road. If we combine the two numbers before making our analysis, however, these insights into future foreclosure trends become impossible.</p>
<p>Also, foreclosure sales at auction are always sales of loans that were already counted as foreclosures when the NED was filed. So, by combining the two numbers, and then including both in the same category, Realtytrac is reporting a foreclosing loan a second time.</p>
<p>It is probably best to not consider the Realtytrac totals as actual counts of foreclosures at all, but as an index number constructed from two dissimilar statistics. However, as we have seen, this index number can often cause us to miss important information contained in the actual foreclosure totals.</p>
<p><strong>Recent measurements</strong></p>
<p>The recent wire story noting that year-over-year foreclosure activity is trending upward highlights some of the problems in basing analysis on Realtytrac&#8217;s combined totals. The State of Colorado&#8217;s data, which does not sample but relies on full totals collected from all counties, shows that 2010 second-quarter NEDs fell 15.6 percent. Foreclosure sales increased 17.7 percent. Clearly, this shows us that two different trends are at work if we look at sales and NEDs separately.</p>
<p>Realtytrac reports that foreclosure activity increased during this period by 4.73 percent. So, did foreclosures increase or decrease during this period? Realtytrac says they increased, but we see in our own numbers that new properties entering foreclosure actually fell almost 16 percent.</p>
<p>However, to make an honest comparison, we need to add together our own NED and sale totals to re-create the Realtytrac method. After adding together the two totals, we still find that Realtyrtrac&#8217;s number is confusing. Adding together the state&#8217;s NEDs and the sales totals for 2010&#8242;s second quarter, and then comparing to the second quarter of last year, we find that the combined total is down 5.9 percent, year-over-year. Again, Realtytrac, using the same combined total, shows an increase of 4.73 percent. So, using Realtytrac&#8217;s own method of analysis for the State&#8217;s totals, we find that Realtytrac&#8217;s numbers show an increase when the real change, based on data from all counties direct from public trustees, is a decline of 5.9 percent.</p>
<p>Since using Realtytrac&#8217;s method of analysis still yields a discrepancy between the state numbers and the Realtytrac numbers, we must therefore conclude that Realtytrac&#8217;s method of data collection is faulty.</p>
<p><strong>Data collection</strong></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s now look at the actual totals reported by Realtytrac and compare them to our own numbers.</p>
<p>First Realtytrac&#8217;s numbers: For the second quarter of 2010, Realtytrac reports an NED total of 10,002 and a sale number of 5,232. The combined total is 15,287. Realtytrac does not provide historical stats in its reports, but if we look up the old second-quarter 2009 report, we find that Realtytrac&#8217;s totals for that period were were 10,938 NEDs and 3,618 sales. The combined total is 14,579. The change from 14,579 to 15,287 is an increase of 4.7 percent, which is reported in the second quarter 2010 Realtytrac report.</p>
<p>The State of Colorado numbers: For the second quarter of 2010, the state&#8217;s public trustees reported an NED total of 10,233 and a sale number of 5,885. The combined total is 16,118. For the second quarter of 2009, the state&#8217;s public trustees reported 12,135 NEDs and 4,999 sales. The combined total is 17,134. The change from 17,134 to 16,118 is a decrease of 5.9 percent, although this statistic was not published in the State&#8217;s second-quarter report since we believe it is not useful and is misleading to combine the NED total and the sale total.</p>
<p>Looking at these totals, we find that Realtytrac under-counted considerably during the second quarter of 2009, and that this incorrectly low number, when compared with the second quarter 2010 total, showed a net positive increase in foreclosure activity between the second quarter of 2009 and the same period this year. It is likely that the change over this period was, in fact, negative.</p>
<p>Also, the fact that NEDs declined over this period while sales increased is key information that is left out of the Realtytrac analysis as packaged for the media.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>Since it is unknown from which counties Realtytrac samples in Colorado, it is difficult to determine the reasons for Realtytrac&#8217;s significantly large under-counting during the second quarter of 2009. However, the fact that small and medium-size counties in Colorado has driven much of the growth in Colorado foreclosures in recent quarters may be important if Realtytrac is not collecting data from these counties.</p>
<p>The Division of Colorado continues to provide the most accurate information on foreclosure trends in Colorado. The state&#8217;s data is taken not from samples, but from complete counts of foreclosure events as provided by the public trustee in each county.</p>
<p>A case study of the 2009 and 2010 second-quarter data is produced above as an example of some of the problematic elements in the Realtytrac data. At this time it is unknown as to what other quarterly or monthly analyses might be affected by similar problems in data collection or analysis.</p>
<p>We believe it is important that media reports of foreclosure trends in Colorado reflect the most accurate data available.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;Ryan McMaken</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-no-12-in-foreclosures/" title="Colorado No. 12 in foreclosures">Colorado No. 12 in foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-no-46-in-foreclosures/" title="Denver No. 46 in foreclosures">Denver No. 46 in foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/colorado-no-10-for-foreclosures/" title="Colorado No. 10 for foreclosures">Colorado No. 10 for foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/11/colorado-no-11-for-foreclosures-in-october/" title="Colorado No. 11 for foreclosures in October">Colorado No. 11 for foreclosures in October</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/09/colorado-ranked-no-8-in-foreclosures/" title="Colorado ranked No. 8 in foreclosures">Colorado ranked No. 8 in foreclosures</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/08/realtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denver-area home rental vacancies hit 3-year high</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/home-rental-vacancies-rise-to-3-year-high/</link>
		<comments>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/home-rental-vacancies-rise-to-3-year-high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Rebchook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Division of Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condominiums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver Rental Houses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Tax Credits for Home Buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Von Stroh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jericho Properties Realty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Alldredge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McMaken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single-family detached homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Townhomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vacancy Rates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=4102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal tax credits may have convinced some people to buy instead of continuing to rent homes, Gordon Von [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-4122" href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/home-rental-vacancies-rise-to-3-year-high/vacancy_dwelling_by_county_single_fam-2/"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4122" style="margin: 5px;" title="Vacancy rate by product type" src="http://insiderealestatenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/vacancy_dwelling_by_county_single_fam1-150x150.jpg" alt="Vacancy rate by product type" width="150" height="150" /></a>Vacancies for Denver-area rental homes rose to a three-year high of 5.5 percent during the fourth quarter, shows a state report released today. The vacancy rate for rental single-family homes, condos and other small properties stood at 4.9 percent a year earlier during the fourth quarter of 2008. The last time the vacancy rate was that high was during the fourth quarter of 2006, when it also stood at 5.5 percent, according to the report Colorado Department of Local Affairs’ Division of Housing<span id="more-4102"></span></p>
<p>It also is taking longer to find tenants for homes. The number of days on the market for single-family rentals and similar properties increased from 45 days during the fourth quarter of 2008 to 53 days during the fourth quarter of 2009. Detached single-family rentals in particular faced a two-year high of 62 days.</p>
<p><strong>Federal tax credits turning renters into buyers</strong></p>
<p>“There is no one economic factor behind the increase, but some of the people that had been in single-family have purchased homes to take advantage of the tax credit,” said Gordon Von Stroh, Professor of business at the University of Denver, and the report’s author. “But the unemployment rate remains above last year’s rates, and that will tend to keep vacancies up.”</p>
<p>The tax incentives to buyers &#8220;is the other element,&#8221; causing fewer people to buy homes, but it not as great of force as it was last fall. The big rush is over,&#8221; said Robert Alldredge, principal of Jericho Properties. &#8220;Last year, when they thought the credits would expire in November, we saw a big rush of people leaving rental homes to buy houses,&#8221; he said. &#8220;And those were our most-qualified renters. They were sort of the cream of the crop. But we have not seen as much of that this year. It&#8217;s just too hard to qualify for a loan. I think a lot of the renters who were qualified to buy, already have taken advantage of the program.&#8221;</p>
<p>The  $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers, which requires a home to be under contract by April 30, and closed by the end of June, is not attracting buyers to condos and townhomes, for the most part, he said. There also is a $6,500 tax credit available for qualified homeowners, some of whom may want to sell their home and buy a smaller one, as well as move up.</p>
<p>&#8220;The tax credit incentive is driving more toward single-family homes and less than condos and townhomes,&#8221; Alldredge said. &#8220;People want house and if the government going to give you a hand out, some people will take it, if they can qualify for a loan.&#8217;</p>
<p>Susan Melton, the broker/owner of Assured Management in Lakewood, agreed with Alldredge.</p>
<p>&#8220;A majority of the good tenants who are taking advantage of the tax credit, want to move into a single-family home, and not a condo or a townhome,&#8221; she said. &#8220;It had a big impact on us at the end of last year, but we have not seen very much activity so far this year. I think the majority of people who qualified for the program have already taken advantage of it.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Single-family homes rule as rentals</strong></p>
<p>Single-family detached homes also are more attractive to renters, Von Stroh said.</p>
<p>&#8220;The overall vacancy rate has run up to 5.5 percent,&#8221; Von Stroh said. &#8220;But when you start looking specifically at the data, single-family home rental vacancy rates are about the same,&#8221; Von Stroh said. &#8220;A year ago, single-family home vacancies were at 4.5 percent and now they are at 4.7 percent. But condo rentals were at 4.5 percent and are now at 6.1 percent. And duplexes were at 4.4 percent, and are now at 7.7 percent.&#8221;</p>
<p>Melton  said one reason for that is because if a family loses its homes in foreclosure, it wants to remain in a rental house, and not a condo or a townhome. &#8221;If you look at the units with five bedrooms or more, there is a zero vacancy rate,&#8221; Melton noted. &#8220;One-bedroom units have the highest vacancy rates.&#8221;</p>
<p>The metro-wide jump in vacancies in single-family rentals and similar properties was driven by increasing vacancies in Denver County and Arapahoe County where vacancy rates were at 6.8 percent and 5.7 percent respectively. Vacancy rates fell in Adams County and Douglas County.  Rates were flat in Jefferson County and in the Boulder/Broomfield area.</p>
<p>Vacancy rates for all counties surveyed were: Adams, 4.1 percent; Arapahoe, 5.7 percent; Boulder/Broomfield, 3.8 percent; Denver, 6.8 percent; Douglas, 3.0 percent; and Jefferson, 4.7 percent.</p>
<p><strong>Rents still rising</strong></p>
<p>In spite of rising vacancy rates, average rents continued to climb.</p>
<p>The average rent for single-family and similar properties rose to $1016.77 during 2009’s fourth quarter, rising from 2008’s fourth quarter rate of $995.24. 2009’s fourth quarter’s average rent is the highest average rent yet recorded for the fourth quarter.</p>
<p>“The fact that average rents continue to rise shows that renter demand for these properties remains relatively high in spite of a soft overall rental market and poor job growth,” said Ryan McMaken, a spokesperson for the Colorado Division of housing. “Owners can afford to raise rents a little since many people still prefer the roominess of a single-family home to an apartment, but today, fewer people view buying a single-family home as the fail-safe purchase that they once did.”</p>
<p>Average rents for all counties were:  Adams, $1024.79; Arapahoe, $995.23; Boulder/Broomfield, $1631.30; Denver, $952.27; Douglas, $1372.91; and Jefferson, $974.90.</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s the mix</strong></p>
<p>But Melton isn&#8217;t seeing rental rates rising.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you look over the last 10 years, the overall rental rates have not increased that much,&#8221; she said. &#8220;Part of the reason rates are up has to do with newer, bigger units entering the rental market from people who either can&#8217;t sell their houses or want to wait until they can get a better price. These homes are not only bigger, but have less wear and tear than a home that has been in the rental pool for the past 20 years, so they get a higher price. But overall, I would say rents are flat.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Colorado Statewide Vacancy and Rent Study is released each quarter by the Colorado Division of Housing. The report is available online at the this <a href="http://dola.colorado.gov/app_uploads/docs/Single_Family_Survey_2009_4_Public.pdf" target="_self">link</a>.</p>
<p><strong><em>Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com or 303-945-6865.</em></strong></p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/bullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets/" title="Bullish outlook for Colorado&#8217;s apartment markets">Bullish outlook for Colorado&#8217;s apartment markets</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/08/rental-housing-vacancy-rates-rise/" title="Rental housing vacancy rates rise">Rental housing vacancy rates rise</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorados-apartment-vacancy-at-7-9-percent/" title="Colorado&#039;s apartment vacancy at 7.9 percent">Colorado&#039;s apartment vacancy at 7.9 percent</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-apartment-vacancies-rise/" title="Denver apartments: Reasons to be bullish">Denver apartments: Reasons to be bullish</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/12/property-manager-cautiously-bullish/" title="Property manager &quot;cautiously bullish&quot;">Property manager &quot;cautiously bullish&quot;</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/home-rental-vacancies-rise-to-3-year-high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullish outlook for Colorado&#8217;s apartment markets</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/bullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/bullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Rebchook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Realty Advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado apartments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Division of Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Von Stroh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Junction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monthly Rents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pueblo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McMaken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sept. 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrance Hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vacancy Rates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=3801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today I posted a blog that showed the overall Colorado vacancy rate at the end of 2009 was 7.9 percent from 8 percent at the end of 2008, and the average and median rents were down slightly during the same time period.</p>
<p>&#8220;Statistically it is unchanged from a year ago, although two years ago the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[if IE]><iframe frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" class="addtoany_special_service google_plusone" src="https://plusone.google.com/u/0/_/%2B1/fastbutton?url=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fbullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets%2F&amp;size=medium&amp;count=false" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:32px;height:20px"></iframe><![endif]--><!--[if !IE]><!--><iframe class="addtoany_special_service google_plusone" src="https://plusone.google.com/u/0/_/%2B1/fastbutton?url=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fbullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets%2F&amp;size=medium&amp;count=false" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:32px;height:20px"></iframe><!--<![endif]--><!--[if IE]><iframe frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" class="addtoany_special_service twitter_tweet" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.html?url=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fbullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets%2F&amp;counturl=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fbullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets%2F&amp;count=none&amp;text=Bullish%20outlook%20for%20Colorado%26%238217%3Bs%20apartment%20markets" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:55px;height:20px"></iframe><![endif]--><!--[if !IE]><!--><iframe class="addtoany_special_service twitter_tweet" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.html?url=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fbullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets%2F&amp;counturl=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fbullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets%2F&amp;count=none&amp;text=Bullish%20outlook%20for%20Colorado%26%238217%3Bs%20apartment%20markets" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:55px;height:20px"></iframe><!--<![endif]--><!--[if IE]><iframe frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" class="addtoany_special_service facebook_like" src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fbullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=75&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=20&amp;ref=addtoany" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:90px;height:21px"></iframe><![endif]--><!--[if !IE]><!--><iframe class="addtoany_special_service facebook_like" src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fbullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=75&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=20&amp;ref=addtoany" scrolling="no" style="border:none;overflow:hidden;width:90px;height:21px"></iframe><!--<![endif]--><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Finsiderealestatenews.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fbullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets%2F&amp;title=Bullish%20outlook%20for%20Colorado%26%238217%3Bs%20apartment%20markets" id="wpa2a_4">Share/Bookmark</a></p><p>Earlier today I posted a <a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorados-apartment-vacancy-at-7-9-percent/" target="_self">blog</a> that showed the overall Colorado vacancy rate at the end of 2009 was 7.9 percent from 8 percent at the end of 2008, and the average and median rents were down slightly during the same time period.</p>
<p>&#8220;Statistically it is unchanged from a year ago, although two years ago the vacancy rate stood at 6.6 percent,&#8221; said Gordon Von Stroh, the University of Denver business professor who authored the report for the Colorado Division of Housing.<span id="more-3801"></span></p>
<p>The monthly average rent for the entire state was $839.81, compared with $851.81 a year earlier, a 1.4 percent drop. The median rent fell 1.8 percent to $782.53 from $797.23, although there were wider swings in vacancies and rents in places such as Grand Junction and Pueblo. Renters also can expect a large number of incentives in those beaten-up markets, while landlords in tighter markets such as Fort Collins are providing very few incentives, Von Stroh said.</p>
<p>&#8220;The overall apartment market for the state has been largely stable, both in terms of rents and vacancy rates,&#8221; said Ryan McMaken, spokesman for the housing division. &#8220;It&#8217;s not like after the 2001 downturn, when we immediately started to see a 10 percent increase in vacancies,&#8221; and a drop in rent price.</p>
<p>Terrance Hunt, an apartment broker with the Denver office of Apartment Realty Advisors, said that leads him to be very bullish on the outlook for the apartment markets in the Denver area and throughout most of the state.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you look at the supply (of apartments) in 2001 and the supply today, you can see that we never fully recovered from 2001 (with the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and the tech wreck),&#8221; Hunt said. &#8220;So we did not experience the over-building that took place in other markets across the country. It all comes back to the supply. We are not seeing much come out of the ground, and yet our population continues to grow. Sure, people are doubling up right now and moving back with their parents, but that is a short-term fix. Right after 2001, we have been absorbing an average of about 5,000 units per year, and much of that was during the subprime crisis, when everyone was able to buy a house. Now that home ownership levels are coming down and it is more difficult to qualify to purchase a house, we are going to see a flood of people renting apartments. And because of the lack of supply, we are going to see a huge run up in demand, with nothing coming on line in 2011.&#8221;</p>
<p>Von Stroh&#8217;s response?</p>
<p>&#8220;I agree 100 percent,&#8221; he said. For example, he said there are only 7,800 units available in the Denver area &#8220;and we&#8217;re putting out 30,000 high school graduates,&#8221; a year. Many of those who do not immediately go to college, will be looking to rent their first apartments, he noted. &#8220;At some point, the parents kick the kids out of the house,&#8221; he joked.</p>
<p>Still, Von Stroh said he worries about the direction of the entire economy, and how that will impact not only apartments, but the entire Colorado economy.</p>
<p>&#8220;In Colorado, I do think that we will see unemployment in 2010 go down a little bit,&#8221; Von Stroh said. &#8220;But a lot of that depends on external factors that we cannot control such as the national economy and the international economy. I do not see a lot of psychological momentum and the federal government is not doing enough to encourage growth in the business sector. So until that kind of cultural and environmental changes take place, I think the overall economy could remain in the doldrums.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com or 303-945-6865.</em></p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/11/statewide-apartment-vacancies-rise/" title="Statewide apartment vacancies rise">Statewide apartment vacancies rise</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorados-apartment-vacancy-at-7-9-percent/" title="Colorado&#039;s apartment vacancy at 7.9 percent">Colorado&#039;s apartment vacancy at 7.9 percent</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/08/apartment-vacancies-rise-statewide/" title="Apartment vacancies rise statewide">Apartment vacancies rise statewide</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/11/8000-tax-credit-may-be-non-event-for-denver-apartments/" title="$8,000 tax credit may be non-event for Denver apartments">$8,000 tax credit may be non-event for Denver apartments</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/home-rental-vacancies-rise-to-3-year-high/" title="Denver-area home rental vacancies hit 3-year high">Denver-area home rental vacancies hit 3-year high</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/bullish-outlook-for-colorados-apartment-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado No. 12 in foreclosures</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-no-12-in-foreclosures/</link>
		<comments>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-no-12-in-foreclosures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Rebchook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Division of Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James J. Saccacio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loan Modifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RealtyTrac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McMaken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=3787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“If history repeats itself we will see a surge in the numbers over the next few months as lenders foreclose on delinquent loans where neither the existing loan modification programs or the new short sale and deed-in-lieu of foreclosure alternative works," James A. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colorado ranked 12th in the country for its foreclosure rate in January, according to a national report released today.</p>
<p>The ranking is a marked improvement from just a few years ago, when Colorado&#8217;s foreclosure rate was leading the nation, according to RealtyTrac, the Irvine, Calif.-based company that released the report. In 2006, Colorado was No. 1 for the most of the year. <span id="more-3787"></span>In 2007, it was usually ranked in the top three.  Even as foreclosure rates soared in other states, surpassing Colorado&#8217;s rate, the state was typically on RealtyTrac&#8217;s top 10 list.</p>
<p><strong>1 out of 428 households in foreclosure</strong></p>
<p>For January, one out of every 428 households in Colorado was in some stage of foreclosure, compared with the overall U.S. average of one out of every 409 households. And while the national foreclosure rate dropped 9.67 percent from December, Colorado&#8217;s dropped by 16.31 percent.   Some 5,029 homes were in some stage of foreclosure from the first Notice of Default to REO (Real Estate Owned) when the bank takes over the property following a public trustee auction, according to RealtyTrac, which collects and sells real estate data.</p>
<p><strong>Colorado holding its own</strong></p>
<p>Ryan McMaken, spokesman for the Colorado Division of Housing, which is last week released its own foreclosure report, using a different methodology, said it makes sense that Colorado has a lower foreclosure rate than the national average, &#8221; given the unprecedented growth in foreclosures in places like Florida, California, Arizona and Michigan.  Colorado simply wasn&#8217;t able to keep up with those places when it came to new foreclosures.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, Colorado&#8217;s unemployment rate is lower than the national average of just below 10 percent.</p>
<p>&#8220;Now employment is the driving factor, and since Colorado has a better unemployment rate than the national average, I expect to see foreclosures here continue to fall behind the national rate,&#8221; McMaken said.</p>
<p>Still, &#8220;we shouldn&#8217;t be smug, of course,&#8221; he added. &#8220;There&#8217;s still no positive job growth in Colorado and we have yet to see what will happen when the home buyer tax credits finally expire,&#8221; later this year.</p>
<p>For the entire nation, there were 315,716 properties in January in some stage of the foreclosure process, according to RealtyTrac. REO activity nationwide was down 5 percent from the previous month, but up 31 percent from January 2009; default notices were down 12 percent from the previous month, but up 4 percent from January 2009; and scheduled foreclosure auctions were down 11 percent from the previous month, but up 15 percent from January 2009.</p>
<p><strong>Foreclosure surge may be coming</strong></p>
<p>“January foreclosure numbers are exhibiting a pattern very similar to a year ago: a double-digit percentage jump in December foreclosure activity followed by a 10 percent drop in January,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac “If history repeats itself we will see a surge in the numbers over the next few months as lenders foreclose onsdelinquent loans where neither the existing loan modification programs or the new short saleand deed-in-lieu of foreclosure alternatives works.”</p>
<p>Nevada was ranked No. 1, with one out of every 95 homes in some stage of foreclosure. Nevada has had that dubious honor for 37 consecutive months. California, Florida and Arizona posted the three highest state totals in terms of properties receiving foreclosure filings in January, and together those states accounted for more than 44 percent of the national total.</p>
<p><em>Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com or 303-945-6865.</em></p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/colorado-no-10-for-foreclosures/" title="Colorado No. 10 for foreclosures">Colorado No. 10 for foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/11/colorado-no-11-for-foreclosures-in-october/" title="Colorado No. 11 for foreclosures in October">Colorado No. 11 for foreclosures in October</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/11/rising-foreclosure-filings-worries-experts/" title="Rising foreclosure filings worries experts">Rising foreclosure filings worries experts</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/08/realtytracs-foreclose-data-wrong-state-officials-says/" title="RealtyTrac&#8217;s foreclosure data wrong, state officials says">RealtyTrac&#8217;s foreclosure data wrong, state officials says</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/03/denver-11th-for-foreclosures/" title="Denver 11th for foreclosures">Denver 11th for foreclosures</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-no-12-in-foreclosures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado foreclosures: Hopeful signs, but crisis isn&#039;t over</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-foreclosures-hopeful-signs-but-crisis-isnt-over/</link>
		<comments>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-foreclosures-hopeful-signs-but-crisis-isnt-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Rebchook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adams County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brothers Redevelopment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Division of Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Paso County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loan modificaitons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RE/MAX Southeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Woodcock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McMaken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shannon Peer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summit County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teller County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timeshares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Slope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=3665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We're making good progress," Ryan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3684" href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-foreclosures-hopeful-signs-but-crisis-isnt-over/foreclosure-sales-per-quarter/"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3684" title="Foreclosure Sales Per Quarter" src="http://insiderealestatenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Foreclosure-Sales-Per-Quarter-150x150.jpg" alt="Foreclosure Sales Per Quarter" width="150" height="150" /></a>Earlier today I <a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-foreclosures-both-rise-and-fall/" target="_self">blogged</a> about a state report that shows foreclosure filings in Colorado in 2009 set a record, but foreclosure sales declined from 2008 and 2007 levels.</p>
<p>Later, experts said that without the Colorado Foreclosure Hotline, 1-877-601-HOPE, which has received more than 60,000 phone calls, has played a big role in stemming the tide of people losing their homes.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re making good progress,&#8221; said Ryan McMaken, who released the report that showed a record 46,394 foreclosure filings last year, an 18 percent increase  from 2008, but only 20,437 foreclosure sales &#8211; a 4 percent drop from 2008.<span id="more-3665"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;I think we are doing very well, especially in light of the 2009 foreclosure filings setting a record, but we still had fewer foreclosures being completed,&#8221; McMaken said.</p>
<p>Last year, a new state law required people who were facing to receive information about the foreclosure hotline. McMaken noted that there were about 19,000 foreclosure filings in the five-month period when the law was in effect last year, and the hotline received about 18,000 calls during that period.</p>
<p>He noted that some people would have called more than once and not everyone who called the hotline during that time period was just beginning the process. Still, it indicates that people are taking advantage of the free hotline, which is staffed by HUD-approved counselors.</p>
<p>&#8220;We know that 16,000 people who called the hotline have reached a resolution,&#8221; McMaken said. &#8220;If you added another 16,000 people to foreclosure sales, it would had a huge increase.&#8221;</p>
<p>Shannon Peer, who heads counseling for the non-profit Brothers Redevelopment, which manages the hotline, said without a doubt it is the single factor that made the biggest dent in the outcome of foreclosure, although he cautioned the state is still dealing with a &#8220;foreclosure crisis.&#8221;</p>
<p>And it typically takes a great deal of patience and persistence on the part of the homeowners, whether they are trying to get a permanent loan modification, a short sale, or something else.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is something that can take many months to resolve,&#8221; Peer said. &#8220;It is not something that is going to change in a month. It&#8217;s a long process. In some ways, it is hard even to compare one six month period to another, because it can take so many months to work its way through the system.&#8221;</p>
<p>Statewide, the former hotbeds of foreclosure sales &#8211; Denver and Adams County &#8211; have shown dramatic drops in foreclosure sales by public trustee offices, noted McMaken.</p>
<p>The growth is primarily occurring in &#8220;mid-sized&#8221; markets on the Western Slope and eastern plains, which is the past weren&#8217;t the victims of rising foreclosures, he said. In some cases, such as around Grand Junction, the problem is because of a job cuts in the formerly growing and lucrative oil and gas industries, he said. In other places, such as Teller and Park counties, people owned homes based on the &#8220;drive to buy&#8221; principle, can no longer have the income to pay their mortgages, because they either lost their jobs or are grossly under-employed.</p>
<p>In addition, resort communities in places such as Eagle and Summit counties, are reporting rising foreclosures. McMaken said that figures indicate that many of those are second homes and maybe a third of them are some form of timeshare units.</p>
<p>Ron Woodcock, a broker with RE/MAX Southeast, said the overall Denver single-family housing market is the strongest he has seen since moving here from Florida 3-1/2 years ago. He said some counties in Florida had 30,000 foreclosure filings last year.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re really bucking the national trend,&#8221; Woodcock said. &#8220;We&#8217;re nothing like California, Florida,  Nevada or Arizona.&#8221;</p>
<p>Woodcock, however, disagrees with some people who say that if mortgage loans were once again assumable, that would help the foreclosure crisis. &#8220;Currently, mortgage rates are lower now than they were two or three years ago,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Why would you assume a loan of 5.5 percent, when you can get a 4 percent loan today? It might help going forward, but it is not going to help today. And while it is harder to qualify for a loan, really what has happened is that we have returned to what it used to take to qualify for a loan.&#8221;</p>
<p>McMaken, of the housing division, said the first wave of foreclosures was due to bad ARMs, interest-only loans, and subprime mortgages. Rising unemployment and falling incomes are responsible for most of today&#8217;s foreclosures, he said.</p>
<p>Woodcock said some lenders now would rather work with borrowers on loan modifications, rather than short sales, in which the bank accepts less than the mortgage amount. Still there have only been 1,072 permanent loan modifications in Colorado through 2009. (For more on loan modifications, please go to this <a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/only-1072-permanent-loan-modifications-in-colorado/">blog</a>.)</p>
<p>But Woodcock said that he does worry about the so-called &#8220;shadow market.&#8221; The shadow market is an unknown number of homes held by the banks, which are not actively being marketed. Nationally, the banks may be holding as many as 7 million properties in this fashion, Woodock said.</p>
<p>&#8220;An influx of a lot of those homes would have a negative effect on the market,&#8221; Woodcock said. &#8220;On the other hand, a lot of investors groups are raising money to buy big portfolios from lenders. They&#8217;ll step in and buy 50, 60 or 100 homes at one time. Those type of deals aren&#8217;t reported in the MLS, but that type of activity is going on.&#8221;</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3686" href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-foreclosures-hopeful-signs-but-crisis-isnt-over/foreclosure-filings-per-quarter-2/"><img class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-3686" title="Foreclosure Filings Per Quarter" src="http://insiderealestatenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Foreclosure-Filings-Per-Quarter1-150x150.jpg" alt="Foreclosure Filings Per Quarter" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p><em>Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com or 303-945-6865.</em></p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/11/rising-foreclosure-filings-worries-experts/" title="Rising foreclosure filings worries experts">Rising foreclosure filings worries experts</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-area-foreclosure-filings-up-6-4/" title="Foreclosures growing in Denver-area suburbs">Foreclosures growing in Denver-area suburbs</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/08/more-than-12000-foreclosures-hit-colorado-in-second-quarter/" title="More than 12,000 foreclosures hit Colorado in second quarter">More than 12,000 foreclosures hit Colorado in second quarter</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-no-12-in-foreclosures/" title="Colorado No. 12 in foreclosures">Colorado No. 12 in foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/colorado-no-10-for-foreclosures/" title="Colorado No. 10 for foreclosures">Colorado No. 10 for foreclosures</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-foreclosures-hopeful-signs-but-crisis-isnt-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denver No. 46 in foreclosures</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-no-46-in-foreclosures/</link>
		<comments>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-no-46-in-foreclosures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Rebchook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Division of Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Springs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Collins-Loveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RealtyTrac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McMaken]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=3490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Denver-Aurora area saw a 12 percent decrease in total foreclosures - everything from notices of election and demands to REOs - according to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Denver-Aurora metropolitan statistical area ranked No. 46 out of 203 markets &#8211; big and small &#8211; tracked by RealtyTrac, the Irvine, Calif.-based company that collects foreclosure data, nationwide.</p>
<p>One out of every 36 households in the Denver area received some kind of foreclosure notice last year, according to RealtyTrac&#8217;s Year-End 2009 Metropolitan Foreclosure Market Report released today. That compares to one out of 45 households nationally.</p>
<p>While foreclosures across the U.S. were up 21.2 percent from, they were down about 12 percent in the Denver area, according to RealyTrac.</p>
<p>The Greeley area was ranked No. 29, with one out of 24 households receiving a foreclosure notice, up 6.5 percent from 2008. Colorado Springs was No. 50, with one of 39 households in foreclosure, an 11 percent increase from 2008. Fort Collins-Loveland was No. 70, with one out of 50 households in foreclosure, 19.7% higher than in 2008, and Boulder was ranked 115th, with one out 77 households in foreclosure, a 28 percent jump  from 2008.</p>
<p>Ryan McMaken, of the Colorado Division of Housing, who plans to release his own statewide-foreclosure report next Thursday, today said the RealtyTrac numbers seem to capture what is happening in Colorado. However, he said because of RealtyTrac&#8217;s methodology of combining all foreclosure actions and treating them as one number, its data will differ for his.<span id="more-3490"></span> McMaken tracks  initial filings and public trustee sales, separately, for example, while RealtyTrac combines them, along with REOs, which are homes taken back by banks.</p>
<p>&#8220;In much of  Colorado &#8211; especially in the Denver area &#8211; foreclosure activity peaked a couple of years ago, while now other parts of the country foreclosure rates are growing,&#8221; McMaken said. &#8220;The general trend of their report seems accurate. Of course, our reports will differ as far as actual numbers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nationwide, the report shows that cities in four Sun Belt states accounted for all top 20 foreclosure rates in 2009 among metro areas with a population of 200,000 or more, but foreclosure activity showed signs of spreading into previously insulated areas asunemployment became more of a driving factor.</p>
<p>California accounted for nine of the top 20 metro foreclosure rates, followed by Florida with eight, Nevada with two and Arizona with one. The highest-ranked metro area outside of those four states was in Boise City-Nampa, Idaho, which ranked No. 24 with 4.66 percent of its housing units receiving at least one foreclosure notice in 2009.</p>
<p>“While it was expected that cities from states with the highest levels of foreclosure activity would top the charts, there is evidence that we’re entering a new wave of foreclosures, driven more by unemployment and economic hardship than what we’ve seen over the past few years,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “Areas like Provo, Utah,Fayetteville, Ark., Portland, Ore., and Rockford, Ill., all posted foreclosure rates above the U.S. average in 2009. And markets like Honolulu, Minneapolis and Seattle saw foreclosure activity increase at more than twice the national pace over the past 12 months — although all three of those markets still had 2009 foreclosure rates that were at or below the U.S. average.”</p>
<p>Las Vegas posted the nation’s highest metro foreclosure rate for the year, with more than 12 percent of its housing units receiving a foreclosure notice in 2009 — more than five times the national average. Las Vegas reported a quarter-over-quarter decline in foreclosure activity in the fourth quarter — as did all the other metro areas with foreclosure rates ranking among the top 10 for 2009.</p>
<p>With 11.87 percent of its housing units receiving a foreclosure notice in 2009, Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Fla., documented the second highest metro foreclosure rate. Other Florida cities in the top 10 were Orlando-Kissimmee at No. 7 (8.17 percent), Port St. Lucie at No. 9 (7.58percent), and Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach at No. 10 (7.16 percent).Merced, Calif., registered the nation’s third highest metro foreclosure rate, with more than 10 percent of its housing units receiving a foreclosure notice in 2009. Other California cities in the top 10 were Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario at No. 4 (8.80 percent), Stockton at No. 5 (8.62 percent), and Modesto at No. 6 (8.53 percent).</p>
<p>The Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale metro area in Arizona documented the nation’s eighth highest metro foreclosure rate in 2009, with more than 8 percent of its housing units receiving a foreclosure notice during the year.</p>
<p><em>Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com or 303-945-6865.</em></p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/foreclosure-filings-fall-sales-skyrocket/" title="Foreclosure filings fall, sales skyrocket">Foreclosure filings fall, sales skyrocket</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-area-foreclosure-filings-up-6-4/" title="Foreclosures growing in Denver-area suburbs">Foreclosures growing in Denver-area suburbs</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/10/denvers-foreclosure-rate-improves/" title="Colorado no longer foreclosure poster boy">Colorado no longer foreclosure poster boy</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2011/07/realtytrac-colorado-9th-for-foreclosures/" title="RealtyTrac: Colorado 9th for foreclosures">RealtyTrac: Colorado 9th for foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/07/denver-aurora-no-49-for-foreclosure-rate/" title="Denver-Aurora No. 49 for foreclosure rate">Denver-Aurora No. 49 for foreclosure rate</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-no-46-in-foreclosures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado No. 10 for foreclosures</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/colorado-no-10-for-foreclosures/</link>
		<comments>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/colorado-no-10-for-foreclosures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 06:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Rebchook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broomfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Division of Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James J. Saccacio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Bankers Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RealtyTrac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McMaken]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=3164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["As bad as the 2009 numbers are, they probably would have been worse if not for legislative and industry-related delays in processing delinquent loans,”  James J. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 9.0px Verdana; min-height: 11.0px;">
<p>The good news is that foreclosure filings in Colorado barely rose from 2008 &#8211; only a 0.23 percent increase, according to a national report.</p>
<p>The bad news is that Colorado still is ranked No. 10, according to RealtyTrac, based in Irvine, Calif.</p>
<p>The report showed 50,514 total properties in Colorado with some kind of foreclosure action, which equates to 2.37 percent of all housing units in foreclosure. The U.S. average is 2.21 percent.  The report also shows one out of every 42 households in foreclosure, compared with one of every 45 for the U.S. average. Foreclosure activity in Colorado, according to RealtyTrac, rose 28.2 percent from 2007, far below the 120 percent average national increase.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s kind of bizarre that Colorado is still in the top 10,&#8221; said Ryan McMaken, noting that the overall rate in Colorado is very close to the national rate. Also, Colorado&#8217;s foreclosure activity has been basically flat, while it is still rising in many other parts of the country.</p>
<p>&#8220;RealtyTrac combines all of the different kind of foreclosure actions,&#8221;McMaken noted, while he separates new filings and homes that actually go to foreclosure sales.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you dig deeper, you will find that while our filings are still climbing, the number of sales are going down,&#8221; as banks work with borrower to modify loans, he noted. &#8220;We do show a net increase in activity, and we probably will continue to do so, as long as the number of filings continue to rise.&#8221;</p>
<p>Still, rather than the 10th worst state in the nation as far as foreclosures, he said Colorado is really more in the middle of the pack, he said. That is also affirmed my Mortgage Banker Association numbers, which shows Colorado in the middle of the U.S., as far as delinquent loans.</p>
<p>An earlier report by <em>InsideRealEstateNews.com</em> found that while foreclosure filings in the Denver area rose by 6.4 percent in 2009 from 2008, most of the percentage increases were found in Boulder, Broomfield and Douglas counties, while activity was flat or dropped slightly in Denver and Adams county. (For that report, please visit this <a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-area-foreclosure-filings-up-6-4/" target="_self">blog</a>.)</p>
<p>Nationwide, RealtyTrac  found more than 3.9 million foreclosure actions -  default notices, scheduled foreclosure auctions and bank repossessions — were reported on 2. 8 million properties in the U.S.  in 2009, a 21 percent increase in total properties from 2008 and a 120 percent increase in total properties from 2007.</p>
<p>Four states accounted for more than 50 percent of the nation’s 2009 total, with more than 1.4 million properties receiving foreclosure filings in California, Florida, Arizona and Illinois. And almost half of those &#8211; 632,573 &#8211; were in California.</p>
<p>&#8220;That means that 46 other states split the remaining half,&#8221; noted McMaken. He said some people might think that the foreclosure pain was spread fairly evenly among the states, but that is not the case.</p>
<p>&#8220;What that means a lot of states are clumped together, and there will be a very small percent separating them,&#8221; McMaken said.</p>
<p>Foreclosure filings were reported on 349,519 U.S. properties foreclosure filings  on 349,519 U.S. properties in December, a 14 percent jump from November  and a 15 percent increase from December 2008 — when a similar monthly jump occurred. Despite the increase in December, foreclosure activity in the fourth quarter decreased 7 percent from the third quarter, although it was still up 18 percent from the fourth quarter of 2008.</p>
<p>“As bad as the 2009 numbers are, they probably would have been worse if not for legislative and industry-related delays in processing delinquent loans,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac.</p>
<p>“After peaking in July with over 361,000 homes receiving a foreclosure notice, we saw four straight monthly decreases driven primarily by short-term factors: trial loan modifications, state legislation extending the foreclosure process and an overwhelming volume of inventory clogging the foreclosure pipeline. Despite all the delays, foreclosure activity still hit a record high for our report in 2009, capped off by a substantial increase in December. In the long term a massive supply of delinquent loans continues to loom over the housing market, and many of those delinquencies will end up in the foreclosure process in 2010 and beyond as lenders gradually work their way through the backlog.”</p>
<p>Nevada led the nation last year, with more than 10 percent of the homes receiving some type of a foreclosure action in 2009, giving it the dubious distinction of being No. 1 for foreclosures for the third consecutive year.</p>
<p><em>Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com or 303-945-6865.</em></p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-no-12-in-foreclosures/" title="Colorado No. 12 in foreclosures">Colorado No. 12 in foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/11/colorado-no-11-for-foreclosures-in-october/" title="Colorado No. 11 for foreclosures in October">Colorado No. 11 for foreclosures in October</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/foreclosure-filings-fall-sales-skyrocket/" title="Foreclosure filings fall, sales skyrocket">Foreclosure filings fall, sales skyrocket</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-no-46-in-foreclosures/" title="Denver No. 46 in foreclosures">Denver No. 46 in foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-area-foreclosure-filings-up-6-4/" title="Foreclosures growing in Denver-area suburbs">Foreclosures growing in Denver-area suburbs</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/colorado-no-10-for-foreclosures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreclosures growing in Denver-area suburbs</title>
		<link>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-area-foreclosure-filings-up-6-4/</link>
		<comments>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-area-foreclosure-filings-up-6-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Rebchook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adams County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Burnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brothers Redevelopment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Castle Pines Village]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Castle Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Division of Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Foreclosure Hotline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keller Williams Realty - DTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Garcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McMaken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sedalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shannon Peer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Slope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insiderealestatenews.com/?p=3134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I guess we thought they just couldn't go any higher," Dianne [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were 26,605 foreclosure filings in the Denver metro area in 2009, a 6.4 percent increase from 2008.</p>
<p>Although the foreclosures last year were the second highest on record &#8211; topped only by the 27,122 filings in 2007 in the seven-county area &#8211; there were signs of encouragement, as well as a sea change in where the foreclosure activity is gaining speed.</p>
<p>Denver County, for example, which a few years ago was ground-zero for foreclosure activity, showed a slight increase in filings in 2009 from 2008. Foreclosures also fell in 2008 from 2007 in Denver County, when it peaked with 8,240 for filings. Denver was the only county to show a decrease in foreclosures in the fourth quarter from the same period in 2008.</p>
<p>Adams County, with many lower-priced homes, also has been at center-stage for foreclosure activity in recent years, but filing activity was flat in 2009 from 2008, as well as the fourth-quarter of 2009 compared with the last three months of 2008. Overall, foreclosure filings in the fourth quarter from the same period in 2008 were up 32 percent. Some observers  are predicting that another wave of foreclosures could sweep over the Denver area next year.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our foreclosure sales are actually down about 20 percent from 2008, and the number of foreclosures being withdrawn are up 17 percent,&#8221; said Carol Snyder,  public trustee for Adams County.</p>
<p><span id="more-3134"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;That means more people are staying in their homes and not losing them in foreclosures,&#8221; Snyder said. &#8220;I think that is a more important than the number of filings.&#8221;</p>
<p>She said banks appear much more willing to work with homeowners than they have been in the past.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think the banks are learning that it is better to modify loans and keep people in their houses than to add more real estate foreclosures to their portfolios,&#8221; Snyder said.</p>
<p>Shannon Peer, director of Housing Counseling, agreed, but is still worried that the state may face more foreclosure filings, which could swamp the state and the system.</p>
<p>He said that the Colorado Foreclosure Hotline (877-601-4673), which Brothers manages, has helped a lot of people learn their options, helping to keep many people out of foreclosure and in their homes.</p>
<p>&#8220;But there are indications that a second wave of foreclosure filings building,&#8221; Peer said, because of the economy. In addition, another round of  option-ARMs are set to adjust upward in the second half of the year, which could be a calamity for homeowners barley hanging on with their current payments, he said.</p>
<p>He said a &#8220;second or third-wave of foreclosure filings,&#8221; could offset the drop in foreclosure sales, as well as drop the increase in foreclosure cures and withdrawals.</p>
<p>Meanwhile,  Boulder, Broomfield and Douglas counties have experienced the largest percentage increases in foreclosures, although their overall numbers are still smaller than in Denver, Adams and Arapahoe counties.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is the highest number we have ever done. Ever,&#8221; said Dianne Bailey, public trustee for Douglas County, where the 2,765 filings in 2009 were almost 27 percent higher than in 2008. Boulder foreclosures rose by more than 38 percent, the biggest increase of the seven area counties.</p>
<p>Bailey was surprised in the surge of foreclosures filings.</p>
<p>&#8220;I thought they were going to level off after 2008,&#8221; she said. &#8220;I guess we thought they just couldn&#8217;t go any higher.&#8221;</p>
<p>More expensive homes entering the foreclosure process is a trend that counselors saw emerge last year, said  Peer, of  Brothers Redevelopment in Edgewater.</p>
<p>&#8220;Over the last year, we have been seeing more homeowners who had higher incomes that we had seen previously,&#8221; Peer said. &#8220;We&#8217;re seeing more home values above $250,000 we had seen in the past. In the past, the under $200,000 price range had been the hard-hit market.  We have seen homes in Evergreen in the $800,000 and $900,000 range, we have seen homes down south in the $600,000 to $650,000 price range. I would say this is a trend that started a good eight months ago. &#8221;</p>
<p>He said it was possible that owners of expensive homes were able to hold out longer than people at the lower-wrung of the economy, but now they, too, are losing their jobs.</p>
<p>One of the challenges they face is that because much of the jumbo-loan money has dried up, it is difficult to find buyers for homes that have mortgages larger than conventional limits of $417,000.</p>
<p>&#8220;They are being pinched,&#8221; Peer said. &#8220;Their are very buyers out there unless they can pay cash. And there aren&#8217;t many cash buyers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bobby Burnett, principal of Keller Williams Realty DTC, said that while his regular home sales business was way down last year, his short-sale business was up 50 percent to 60 percent from 2008. A short sale is when a lender takes less than the mortgage amount.</p>
<p>Although the prices were &#8220;all across the board,&#8221; the biggest increase of distressed properties was for ultra-expensive homes.</p>
<p>&#8220;We saw them in Parker, Castle Rocky, a bunch in Boulder,&#8221; Burnett said. &#8220;The only place that seemed semi-insulated  was Castle Pines Village. I find properties are still selling there.&#8221;</p>
<p>Many of the expensive homes are selling for huge discounts, he said.</p>
<p>He tried to sell one home west of Sedalia for $1.1 million, which previously had sold for $1.4 million. Later, the home went into foreclosure and another broker sold it for $750,000.</p>
<p>Perhaps one of the biggest bargains is a 9,000-square-foot home on 11 acres in Elbert County that was appraised at $3 million three years ago.  It&#8217;s likely now to sell in a short sale for about $800,000, he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;The house looks like a southern mansion in Atlanta,&#8221; Burnett said.</p>
<p>Denver City Councilman Rick Garcia, who a couple of years created a Foreclosure Task Force, said that he is not surprised that foreclosure activity is rising faster in the suburbs than in the city.</p>
<p>&#8220;As I recall a couple of years ago from data from the Foreclosure Task Force, the average price of a home in foreclosure in Denver was around $124,000, far below the median-price of a home in the city,&#8221; Garcia said.</p>
<p>Many of those homes, he said, have been purchased with the help of federal funds or have been &#8220;gobbled up&#8221; by private investors. They have since been &#8220;rehabilitated&#8221; and put back into the market, he said.</p>
<p>The first round of foreclosures came from &#8220;unscrupulous lenders,&#8221; who saddled buyers with high-mortgage rates, Garcia said. Many of those homes in Denver have since worked their way through the system, Garcia said.</p>
<p>He said he thinks many more of those kind of loan, as well as no downpayment loans that were not supported by incomes, were made in suburban subdivisions.</p>
<p>&#8220;Denver seems to be bottoming out of the foreclosure circumstances,&#8221; Garcia said. &#8220;Now, I would say we are seeing more of what I would call &#8220;traditional&#8221; foreclosures, caused by people losing their jobs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ryan McMaken, spokesman for the Colorado Division of Housing, said that the Denver-area data seems to confirm that more expensive homes in suburban areas are now suffering from growing foreclosures.</p>
<p>&#8220;Overall, what I would say is that the Denver-area is fairly flat, while foreclosures are rising elsewhere in Colorado,&#8221; McMaken said.</p>
<p>Later this months, McMaken will release a report that will show a record number of foreclosure filings in the state. In 2008, there were just under 40,000 foreclosure filings in all of Colorado, but his data will show more than 45,000 filings in 2009.</p>
<p>There are still a few counties to report to the division, but he expects about 47,000 filings when he receives all of the data. &#8220;I&#8217;m already at something like 45,400,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>He noted that when the foreclosure crisis began several years ago, &#8220;the Denver-area was driving it,&#8221; and much of the area outside of the metro area remained impervious.</p>
<p>That is no longer true, as more populous areas along the eastern plains, as well as a number of Western slope communities, are seeing huge percentage increases in foreclosures.</p>
<p>&#8220;Of course, there are other economic factors driving the foreclosures in a lot of mid-sized counties outside of the Denver metro area,&#8221; he said. For example, a downturn in mining and exploration is hurting the Grand Junction area, while the failure of Greeley-based New Frontier Bank hurt ranchers and farmer.</p>

<table id="wp-table-reloaded-id-67-no-1" class="wp-table-reloaded wp-table-reloaded-id-67">
<thead>
	<tr class="row-1 odd">
		<th class="column-1">County </th><th class="column-2">Foreclosure filings 2008</th><th class="column-3">Foreclosure filings 2009</th><th class="column-4">% change 2009 from 2008</th><th class="column-5">4th Q 2008</th><th class="column-6">4th Q 2009</th><th class="column-7">% change </th>
	</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
	<tr class="row-2 even">
		<td class="column-1">Adams*</td><td class="column-2">5,648</td><td class="column-3">5,631</td><td class="column-4">0%</td><td class="column-5">1,263</td><td class="column-6">1,290</td><td class="column-7">0</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-3 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Arapahoe</td><td class="column-2">6,600</td><td class="column-3">6,260</td><td class="column-4">3.3%</td><td class="column-5">1,384</td><td class="column-6">1,597</td><td class="column-7">15%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-4 even">
		<td class="column-1">Boulder</td><td class="column-2">1,041</td><td class="column-3">1,441</td><td class="column-4">38.4%</td><td class="column-5">260</td><td class="column-6">351</td><td class="column-7">35%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-5 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Broomfield</td><td class="column-2">264</td><td class="column-3">339</td><td class="column-4">28.4</td><td class="column-5">44</td><td class="column-6">83</td><td class="column-7">88.5%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-6 even">
		<td class="column-1">Denver</td><td class="column-2">6,145</td><td class="column-3">6,141</td><td class="column-4">0%</td><td class="column-5">1,386</td><td class="column-6">1,351</td><td class="column-7">-2.25%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-7 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Douglas</td><td class="column-2">2,180</td><td class="column-3">2,766</td><td class="column-4">26.8%</td><td class="column-5">605</td><td class="column-6">747</td><td class="column-7">23.5%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-8 even">
		<td class="column-1">Jefferson</td><td class="column-2">3,669</td><td class="column-3">4.027</td><td class="column-4">9.8%</td><td class="column-5">901</td><td class="column-6">988</td><td class="column-7">9.7%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-9 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Total</td><td class="column-2">25,005</td><td class="column-3">26,605</td><td class="column-4">6.4%</td><td class="column-5">5,843</td><td class="column-6">6,407</td><td class="column-7">32.2%</td>
	</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<p>Sources: Public Trustees</p>
<p>*Adams County removed &#8220;repeat&#8221; filings, which reduced the total amount by about 100 each year.</p>
<p><em>Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com or 303-945-6865.</em></p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/colorado-foreclosures-hopeful-signs-but-crisis-isnt-over/" title="Colorado foreclosures: Hopeful signs, but crisis isn&#039;t over">Colorado foreclosures: Hopeful signs, but crisis isn&#039;t over</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-no-46-in-foreclosures/" title="Denver No. 46 in foreclosures">Denver No. 46 in foreclosures</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/10/foreclosures-soar-63-percent-in-third-quarter/" title="Foreclosures soar 63 percent in third quarter">Foreclosures soar 63 percent in third quarter</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/02/only-1072-permanent-loan-modifications-in-colorado/" title="Only 1,072 permanent loan modifications in Colorado">Only 1,072 permanent loan modifications in Colorado</a></li><li><a href="http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/colorado-no-10-for-foreclosures/" title="Colorado No. 10 for foreclosures">Colorado No. 10 for foreclosures</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insiderealestatenews.com/2010/01/denver-area-foreclosure-filings-up-6-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

